Democrats intensify demand for full Mueller report

Democrats set a Tuesday deadline to view the confidential Mueller report. Attorney General William Barr is expected to release a version of the report by mid-April. Meanwhile, the president boasts about total exoneration on the 2020 campaign trail. 

|
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi heaps scorn on Attorney General William Barr during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington on March 28, 2019 after Mr. Barr concluded there was no evidence the Trump campaign 'conspired or coordinated' with Russia.

Democrats intensified their demands for Robert Mueller's full report after learning the special counsel's findings from his Trump-Russia investigation run to more than 300 pages, while President Donald Trump boasted of total exoneration based on a four-page summary by his attorney general.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler was told by Attorney General William Barr that there's no intention of giving the confidential report to Congress immediately as he redacts grand jury testimony and other elements.

Democrats say they may subpoena the report if it's not forthcoming by their Tuesday deadline, which Mr. Barr has said will not be met.

Through the day, tempers were rising on Capitol Hill.

Shaking her fist for emphasis, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Mr. Barr's summary, which cleared Mr. Trump of campaign collusion with Russia and criminal obstruction of Mr. Mueller's federal probe, was "condescending" and "arrogant."

"Mr. Attorney General," she said, "show us the report and we'll come to our own conclusions." She asked what Mr. Trump and the Republicans were afraid of and mocked them as "scaredy-cats."

Mr. Trump himself headed to Grand Rapids, Michigan, for a Thursday campaign rally, where he deemed the probe "the greatest hoax in the history of our country" and warned that those behind it "would be held accountable."

"After three years of lies and smears and slander, the Russia hoax is dead," Mr. Trump told a packed house of roaring supporters. "This was nothing more than a sinister effort to undermine our historic election victory and to sabotage the will of the American people."

The length of Mr. Mueller's still-confidential report makes clear that there are substantially more details that he and his team have documented in their investigation than Mr. Barr disclosed to Congress and the public. The volume of pages was described Thursday by a Justice Department official and another person familiar with the document.

The Justice Department official said Mr. Barr discussed the length of the report during a phone call Wednesday with Mr. Nadler, who would only indicate it was less than 1,000 pages.

Both the department official and the other person spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the document.

Mr. Barr would not commit to providing the full report with its underlying evidence, according to a House Democratic aide granted anonymity Thursday to brief reporters.

The attorney general has been going through the report amid Democratic concerns that what has been made public so far was tilted in Mr. Trump's favor. It's unclear whether whatever Mr. Barr might release next will be Mr. Mueller's own words or another summary. Mr. Nadler offered to join Mr. Barr to seek a judge's approval to unseal grand jury testimony, the aide said.

Mr. Barr has said he'll provide Congress with at least a partial version in April and told Mr. Nadler he would agree to testify before his committee.

As that battle brews, House Democrats barreled ahead with their own investigation of the Trump administration, and Mr. Trump resumed his attack on Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., just as the chairman of the intelligence committee was about to gavel his panel into session.

"Congressman Adam Schiff, who spent two years knowingly and unlawfully lying and leaking, should be forced to resign from Congress!" Mr. Trump tweeted early Thursday.

Republicans picking up on Mr. Trump's complaints formalized their demand that Mr. Schiff resign as chairman of the intelligence panel over his comments that there was significant evidence the president and his associates conspired with Russia.

"We have no faith in your ability to discharge your responsibilities" in line with the Constitution, the Republicans wrote to Mr. Schiff in a missive they read aloud at the hearing.

Republicans pointed to Mr. Barr's synopsis, released Sunday, that said Mr. Mueller's probe didn't find that Mr. Trump's campaign "conspired or coordinated" with the Russian government to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Mr. Schiff stood by his remarks, listing the meetings that people in Mr. Trump's circle had with Russians. He noted Mr. Trump's pursuit of a deal to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

"There is a different word for that than collusion, and it's called compromise," Mr. Schiff said, as he opened the session. The hearing was called to provide an overview on how Russia in the past has blackmailed Americans.

Since Mr. Barr's findings were released, Mr. Schiff this week has repeated his assertion that evidence of collusion is in "plain sight." He says Mr. Mueller's failure to find a criminal conspiracy with Russia does not absolve the Trump campaign.

Ms. Pelosi stood by Mr. Schiff, saying she was proud of him and taunting Republicans – including Mr. Trump – for fearing the chairman, whom she called a "patriotic leader."

"What is the president afraid of, Is he afraid of the truth?" she said. "They're just scaredy-cats."

Democrats complain that Mr. Barr overstepped by making the determination, with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, that Mr. Trump did not obstruct the investigation.

While Mr. Barr's summary Sunday said Mr. Mueller did not find that the Trump campaign "conspired or coordinated" with the Russian government to influence the 2016 presidential election, it also said Mr. Mueller reached no conclusion on whether Mr. Trump obstructed the federal investigation, instead setting out "evidence on both sides" of the question.

"I would hope the attorney general would not be acting as a political operative for the president," said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a member of the Judiciary Committee. "The Department of Justice should not be involved in a cover-up of what's actually in the report."

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said Wednesday he was disappointed Mr. Barr would take weeks, not days, to release the report.

"The president has now an opportunity for weeks, it sounds like, to do these victory laps," said Representative Cummings, noting that Mr. Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen, is among those headed to jail as a result of the probe. "Cohen goes to jail, the president runs a victory lap."

Mr. Barr told the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., that he's combing through Mr. Mueller's report and removing classified, grand jury, and other information in hopes of releasing the rest to Congress.

Mr. Trump has said he's fine with releasing the findings. "The president said, 'Just let it go,' and that's what's going to happen," Senator Graham said.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Eric Tucker, Kevin Freking, Andrew Taylor, Catherine Lucey, Jill Colvin, Alan Fram, Mike Balsamo, and Padmananda Rama contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Democrats intensify demand for full Mueller report
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2019/0329/Democrats-intensify-demand-for-full-Mueller-report
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe