House committee expected to give Mueller transcripts from Russia probe

The House Intelligence Committee votes today on whether it should cooperate with special counsel Robert Mueller regarding the Russia investigation, potentially reversing a decision made last year under Republican leadership.

|
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Rep. Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California and a ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, exits a secure area to speak with reporters on Capitol Hill on March 22, 2018. The committee is expected to vote to hand over more than 50 interview transcripts to special counsel Robert Mueller.

In the panel's first act since Democrats took the majority, the House Intelligence Committee is expected to vote Wednesday to send more than 50 interview transcripts from its now-closed Russia investigation to special counsel Robert Mueller.

The panel's new chairman, California Rep. Adam Schiff, has long said that sending Mr. Mueller the transcripts from the probe into Russian election interference would be one of his first actions. Two associates of President Trump have already been charged with lying to the committee, and Representative Schiff has said Mueller should consider whether additional perjury charges are warranted as part of the special counsel's investigation.

As is tradition, the committee will meet behind closed doors. A notice for the meeting says that one of the agenda items is "transmission of certain committee transcripts to the Department of Justice." A person familiar with the meeting said the vote is to send the transcripts to Mueller's office. The person asked not to be named because committee business is confidential.

The vote comes the morning after Mr. Trump criticized "ridiculous partisan investigations" in his State of the Union speech. Schiff has indicated that he will re-open parts of the committee probe that Republicans closed last March, concluding there was no evidence of conspiracy or collusion between Russia and Trump's presidential campaign. Democrats strongly objected at the time, saying that the Republicans prematurely closed the investigation.

Trump's former fixer and personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, and a longtime adviser, Roger Stone, have been charged with lying to the panel. Mr. Cohen pleaded guilty in November to lying to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees in a statement about his role in a Trump business proposal in Moscow, acknowledging that he misled lawmakers by saying he had abandoned the project in January 2016 when he actually continued pursuing it for months after that.

Cohen, who is scheduled to begin serving a three-year prison sentence in March, will return to the House panel on Friday for another closed-door interview, this time with Democrats leading the questioning. Since he testified in 2017, Cohen has turned on the president, cooperating with Mueller's probe and a separate investigation in New York. He was charged with crimes that included arranging the payment of hush money to conceal his boss' alleged sexual affairs and told a judge that he agreed to cover up Trump's "dirty deeds" out of "blind loyalty."

Mr. Stone pleaded not guilty to charges last month that he lied to the House panel about his discussions during the 2016 election about WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy group that released thousands of emails stolen from Democrats. Stone is also charged with obstructing the House probe by encouraging one of his associates, New York radio host Randy Credico, to refuse to testify before the House panel in an effort to conceal Stone's false statements.

Mueller requested Stone's interview transcript last year and the panel voted to release it in December, ahead of the January charges. Democrats had previously pushed the GOP-led committee to release all of the transcripts to Mueller, but Republicans said Mueller hadn't requested them. The committee did vote to release most of the transcripts to the public, but they are still being reviewed by the intelligence community for classified information.

It is unclear if Mueller has since requested any other transcripts, or if he has already seen any of them. It is possible that Mueller could have gained access to the documents through the intelligence agencies that are reviewing them.

Among the transcripts that would be released would be interviews with Trump's eldest son, Donald Trump Jr.; his son-in-law, Jared Kushner; his longtime spokeswoman, Hope Hicks; and his former bodyguard Keith Schiller. There are dozens of other transcripts of interviews with former Obama administration officials and Trump associates.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to House committee expected to give Mueller transcripts from Russia probe
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2019/0206/House-committee-expected-to-give-Mueller-transcripts-from-Russia-probe
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe