Voter ID law may prevent some Native Americans from voting

The US Supreme Court recently upheld a state law in North Dakota that demands voters have ID cards with residential addresses. But many Native Americans do not have fixed addresses, making this law yet another barrier to voting.

Rick Bowmer/AP/File
Brandon Nez of the Navajo Nation displays his flag near his jewelry stand in Monument Valley, Utah, in October 2018.

Looking ahead to next week's critical US elections, American Indians say a recent US Supreme Court move threatens to keep tribal members from casting ballots.

The court upheld a state law in North Dakota that demands voters have identification cards with residential addresses, a requirement that some tribes say discriminates against members who use postal boxes rather than street addresses.

Tribal activists are scrambling to set up a temporary address system to use on Nov. 6 for voting.

Voter identification is a contentious issue in the United States, where critics say Republicans and supporters of President Trump are trying to keep less affluent, more left-leaning, or minority voters from the polls.

At issue are the midterm elections on Nov. 6, when the Democratic Party is aiming to win some control of the federal government dominated by Mr. Trump and the Republican Party.

In the US Senate race in North Dakota, the sitting lawmaker's last win relied heavily on Native American votes.

The voter ID law could affect more than 1,000 people on the Standing Rock Reservation, home to one of the state's poorest counties, said Danielle Finn, external affairs director for the local Sioux tribe, one of five tribes recognized in the state.

Overall, the law could disenfranchise about 70,000 North Dakota residents who lack adequate addresses for voting, according to court documents.

"We thought it was so obvious this was voter disenfranchisement," Ms. Finn told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Standing Rock was the site of a months-long standoff that ended last year between authorities and tribes trying to block an oil pipeline.

Voter ID requirements

Charges of voter suppression are taking place across the country, such as in Georgia, where a law requires an exact name match between a voter's registration and identification card.

Tens of thousands of registrations have been put on hold, most of them black voters.

Each US state sets its own laws on voter identification requirements.

North Dakota's law, passed in 2014, is part of a wave of legislation in primarily conservative states since the 2010 election, ostensibly to cut down on voter fraud.

The 2010 midterm elections were the first after Democratic President Barack Obama was elected and Democrats seized control of Congress.

Two dozen states, including Georgia, have tightened restrictions since, according to the Brennan Center for Justice, a think tank.

North Dakota's law was challenged in the courts until the Supreme Court opted on Oct. 11 to let it stand.

In response, tribes launched a system to create addresses to be used on tribal letterhead, which will be accepted as identification.

Based on residential deliveries of propane fuel on the largely rural and remote reservations, land parcels will be issued addresses, said Bret Healy of Four Directions, a voter advocacy group.

"It will be similar to an office or apartment complex, where everybody has the same address," Mr. Healy said, calling the state's voter ID law a "surgical decimation of the native vote."

Indian tribes have their own sovereign governments, but tribal members are US citizens and vote in federal elections.

At Standing Rock this past weekend, musician Dave Matthews performed at a get-out-the-vote concert.

"Why must it be so difficult for these particular people to claim this is their home?" he asked the crowd.

The state's top election official says the law ensures voting integrity and is in line with many other states.

"Never was there any intent or discussion about targeting anybody. We just want all qualified voters who are North Dakota residents to provide identification," North Dakota Secretary of State Alvin Jaeger told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Concern over the law is linked to the broader issue of housing, said Jacqueline De Leon, an attorney with the Native American Rights Fund, a legal assistance group that sued the state this week over the law.

"This law is ultimately imposing a property requirement ... and that's just not the reality facing Native Americans today," she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Reservations have severe housing shortages, with many people living in one home or moving house to house, and many people are altogether homeless, she said.

"It's years and years of neglect and other types of discrimination that have led Native Americans to be living in these conditions, and they shouldn't be penalized for that at the ballot box," Ms. De Leon said.

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Voter ID law may prevent some Native Americans from voting
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today