States quickly tap federal funds to strengthen election systems

Ahead of the midterms, states are spending millions of federal dollars to improve voting systems amid Russian threats. More than a quarter of the money will go to buy new voting equipment, although not all of that will be installed by Nov. 6

David Goldman/AP/File
Kelly Monroe (l.), an investigator with the Georgia Secretary of State office, examines a new voting machine that produces a paper record being tested at a polling site in Conyers, Ga., on Oct. 19, 2017. States have quickly put to use $380 million from the federal government to help them improve their election systems.

Racing to shore up their election systems before November, states are using millions of dollars from the federal government to tighten cybersecurity, safeguard their voter registration rolls, and improve communication between county and state election officers.

The US Election Assistance Commission released a report Tuesday showing how states plan to spend $380 million allocated by Congress last spring to strengthen voting systems amid ongoing threats from Russia and others.

All but a fraction of the money has already been sent to the states, the District of Columbia, US territories. The largest chunk – roughly 36 percent – is being spent to improve cybersecurity in 41 states and territories.

More than a quarter of the money will be used to buy new voting equipment in 33 states and territories, although not all of that will be in place by the Nov. 6 midterm elections.

States have been scrambling to increase their cyber defenses, upgrade voting systems, and provide training to local election officials since it was revealed that Russian hackers targeted election systems in at least 21 states in 2016, although the number is likely greater. There has been no indication any vote tallies were changed.

Meanwhile, the nation's intelligence chiefs warn of the ongoing threat of Russian interference. On Tuesday, Microsoft said it had uncovered new Russian hacking attempts targeting US political groups.

A Senate report earlier this year urged states to replace outdated voting equipment and ensure all ballots are cast on machines that produce a paper record allowing voters to verify their selections.

Five states exclusively use touchscreen voting machines that provide no such record, along with more than 300 counties in eight other states, according to Verified Voting, a nonprofit group focused on ensuring the accuracy of elections. One of those states, Georgia, indicated it would use half of its $10.3 million federal grant toward new voting machines, although that amount is just a fraction of what's needed.

The total cost to ensure a paper trail for all Georgia voters could be as high as $120 million depending on what type of machine the state buys for its 159 counties. The machines will not be in place for the November elections.

While New Jersey uses machines similar to those in Georgia, officials there determined the bulk of the state's $9.7 million will be offered to local election officials as grants to address the risks identified in comprehensive security reviews of their voting systems.

A survey earlier this year by the Brennan Center for Justice found that officials in 33 states said they must replace their voting machines by 2020. Many voting systems rely on software and hardware that is no longer supported by manufacturers.

"This is a looming crisis for the United States," said the center's Lawrence Norden. "That is true whether we have to worry about the threat of Russians or other nation-states attacking us."

About $50.7 million, or about 13 percent of the federal total, will be used to improve voter registration systems in 29 states. Russian hackers breached Illinois's voter registration system in 2016, although officials have said no information was changed or deleted.

Experts remain concerned about the security of those systems, saying hackers could change names, addresses, or polling place information and cause confusion, long lines, and delays in reporting election results. In turn, such chaos could undermine confidence in the results.

In accepting the federal money, states were required to provide a match of 5 percent.

This article was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to States quickly tap federal funds to strengthen election systems
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today