'Pink wave' continues as more women than ever win primaries

A record number of women are running and winning primaries ahead of US midterm elections, coming on a wave of increased enthusiasm among women voters. The November ballots could go a long way to improving the nation's record of female representation. 

John Bazemore/AP/File
Georgia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams smiles as supporters cheer during an election-night watch party in Atlanta on May 22, 2018. If she wins in November, Ms. Abrams would be the nation's first black female governor.

Women are not just running for office in record numbers this year – they are winning.

More women than ever before have won major party primaries for governor, US Senate, and House this year – setting a US record and paving the way for November battles that could significantly increase the number of women in elected office and change the public debate on issues such as health care, immigration, abortion rights, education, and gun control. Some of these candidates could also play a pivotal role in whether Democrats are able to take control of the US House.

Most of these female hopefuls are Democrats, some of whom are first-time candidates who say their motivation to run sprang from President Trump's election and Republican control of Congress. But other developments factor in, too. The #MeToo movement. Women's marches. Mr. Trump's nomination of conservative appeals court Judge Brett Kavanaugh to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.

"Part of the reason I thought this race was possible, even despite great odds, was because of all the women who are so engaged in my community in a new way," said Democrat Mikie Sherrill, a former Navy helicopter pilot and federal prosecutor who looks to capture a GOP congressional seat in New Jersey.

Ms. Sherrill is one of some 200 women who have won their primaries for US House, with 94 of these candidates surviving crowded fields with three or more candidates, according to an analysis of election results. Previously, the most women who had advanced were 167 in 2016, according to records kept by the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University.

In the Senate, a record 19 women have won their primaries. And for the first time, 13 women have been nominated for gubernatorial races in a single election year.

And all these numbers are likely to grow with nine states yet to hold their primaries. Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo (D) and Rep. Gwen Graham (D) of Florida are among nine women running for governor who will face primary voters in coming weeks. No more than nine women have ever led states at the same time.

"We are seeing a level of enthusiasm among women voters that we haven't seen in a long time," said Democrat Laura Kelly, who is running for governor in Kansas and will need women, independents, and moderate Republicans in her bid against Republican Kris Kobach.

There are few instances in which women – in a sense – have already won. In New Mexico, two women will be competing to replace Rep. Steve Pearce (R) and the same is happening in races in Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and Michigan. But overall gains will also be dependent on how well the 71 congresswomen running for reelection fare in November.

Success in November will go a long way to improving the nation's dismal record of female representation. Currently, women account for just a fifth of the 535 US representatives and senators, and one in four state lawmakers. Six of the nation's 50 governors are female. Women comprise slightly more than half the US population.

Women appear to be running strong so far. As of mid-August, some 49 percent of women running for the House have advanced to the general election, with about 40 percent in the Senate and about 25 percent running for governor, according to an analysis of election results.

But that's no guarantee of victory this fall. Many of the women, particularly Democrats, are running in long-held Republican congressional districts or states where Republicans have consolidated support.

One thing women have accomplished already is changing the tone and content of campaigns. They bring their children to rallies and some want their campaign money to pay for child care so they can run. On this count, Liuba Grechen Shirley, the Democratic candidate challenger to Republican Rep. Peter King of New York, has succeeded. In May, the Federal Election Commission voted unanimously to allow the expenditure.

"I was told that with two kids, a husband who worked full time, and no child care, that it was impossible," Ms. Grechen Shirley says in an online ad, noting her effort to change the policy. "Well, it wasn't impossible. It's just really hard."

Experienced combat veterans running for Congress this year are featuring their families in their ads as they speak with authority on national security and foreign policy.

"The old model is a little bit like trying to fit women into the mold of male candidates," said Deborah Walsh, director of the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University. "Women had a very narrow path that they could navigate as candidates: What was appropriate to wear, what was appropriate to say. They also were asked: If you win, who is going to take care of your children? This is not a question that men are confronted with."

Beyond gender, these women are poised to usher in a wave of diversity next year.

Michigan will likely send the nation's first Muslim-American woman to Congress, after Rashida Tlaib beat a crowded field of Democrats for the 13th Congressional District. No Republican is running in November for the heavily Democratic seat.

There are nearly 50 black women running for Congress this year, from Democrat Lucy McBath who is challenging Rep. Karen Handel (R) in Georgia to Rep. Mia Love's (R) bid for a third term in Utah.

In Georgia, Stacey Abrams is aiming to become the nation's first black female governor while Paulette Jordan would be the first Native American governor in US history if she wins her race in Idaho. And Democratic voters in Vermont recently selected Christine Hallquist as their nominee, making her the first transgender candidate to win a major-party gubernatorial nomination.

Black women are competing – and winning – not only in districts with a majority black electorate, but also in diverse districts across the country. Each victory is a vote of confidence in their leadership for those who step up, said Kimberly Peeler-Allen, co-founder of Higher Heights for America, which supports black female candidates and galvanizes black women as voters.

"In addition to black women wanting to be part of history, people are realizing that regardless of what you look like, the leadership of the country has been predominantly white and male for far too long," Ms. Peeler-Allen said. "Seeing the value of having diverse voices around decision-making tables is not limited to one demographic group, but includes people who want a more reflective democracy."

This article was reported by The Associated Press. Laurie Kellman reported from Washington. AP national writer Errin Haines Whack in Philadelphia and AP writer Justin Myers in Chicago contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Pink wave' continues as more women than ever win primaries
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today