Allowing path to citizenship for Dreamers proves divisive within GOP

As House Republicans search for a solution to their campaign-season standoff over "Dreamers," the question of whether to provide them a conduit to citizenship has split the party's moderate and conservative factions. 

Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP/File
Freedom Caucus Chairman Rep. Mark Meadows (R) of South Carolina, speaks to reporters on July 19, 2017 in Washington. The House Freedom Caucus represents a hard-right perspective within the GOP that argues no special route to citizenship should be given to Dreamers.

Divisions over whether to provide a conduit to citizenship for young "Dreamer" immigrants brought to the US illegally loomed as the pivotal sticking point Wednesday as House Republicans searched for a solution to their campaign-season standoff over an issue that has split them for years.

In bargaining Wednesday, moderates told conservatives that any deal would have to include steps that could ultimately lead to citizenship for hundreds of thousands of Dreamers. The issue was left unresolved, according to two Republicans who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe private talks.

Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R) of Florida, a leader of moderates trying to force leaders to hold votes on the issue, told reporters that of all his immigration priorities, permanent status for Dreamers was "most important" and "essential." But Rep. Mark Meadows (R) of North Carolina, leader of the hard-right House Freedom Caucus, said that "no special pathway to citizenship" would be acceptable to conservatives.

"Why would we give blanket waivers to people who came here illegally?" Mr. Meadows told reporters.

Mr. Curbelo and Meadows both said it was possible to find middle ground between their positions. But compromise has eluded party leaders for years, and it remained unclear how they would resolve the impasse by next month, when House leaders have promised showdown immigration votes.

Leaders set a pivotal closed-door meeting on immigration among House Republicans for June 7, days after lawmakers return from a weeklong recess. Rep. John Katko, (R) of New York, said he and other moderates would see if that session could produce an accord among Republicans before pressing ahead on a petition drive that could force votes on the issue.

"If they come to a good agreement, great. If they don't we're going forward," he said.

Bills backed by moderates would give hundreds of thousands of Dreamers a way to become permanent US residents – a status that can later lead to citizenship. Dreamers were brought to the US illegally as children and have been temporarily protected by an Obama-era program that President Trump has terminated, though courts have kept the initiative alive for now.

Conservatives want legislation that would let those immigrants stay in the US in renewable but temporary increments. They have opposed creating a new way for them to move toward citizenship and would instead limit them to existing pathways, such as marrying a US citizen.

Curbelo and other moderates gained their 21st Republican signature Wednesday on a petition that would force a series of votes on immigration bills that House leaders are trying to avoid. With all 193 Democrats expected to sign, the moderates need just four more Republican names to reach 218, a House majority, and moderate leaders say they have enough commitments to reach 25.

The moderates want votes on four bills, including measures by conservatives and liberals.

Under that process, the measure likeliest to prevail would let Dreamers stay in the US permanently and bolster border security, but not finance the border wall with Mexico that Mr. Trump wants. Since that bill would be backed by virtually all Democrats but just a smattering of Republicans, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R) of Wisconsin has tried to derail the drive.

Instead, GOP leaders plan for the House to vote on immigration the third week in June – a week before the votes moderates want could be held. Republicans say the only measure leaders have committed to consider is a conservative package that would reduce legal immigration, help Trump build his wall, and punish "sanctuary cities" that hinder federal authorities pursuing immigrants here illegally.

Under House rules, if the chamber votes on that measure first, it would force the moderates to begin their petition drive all over again, Republicans say.

That would be a blow to moderates because many face difficult re-election races in pro-immigration districts and want to show voters progress before November's elections.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Allowing path to citizenship for Dreamers proves divisive within GOP
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2018/0524/Allowing-path-to-citizenship-for-Dreamers-proves-divisive-within-GOP
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe