The journey toward healing in Charlottesville

During the recent National Week of Conversation, the Monitor moderated a panel discussion on race in Charlottesville. Here's what it was like to take part in the city's continuing efforts to find healing after last year's protests.

Chuck Nacke/Common Ground Committee
Donna Brazile (l.) and Michael Steele participate in a panel discussion on race sponsored by the Common Ground Committee in Charlottesville, Va., on April 22.

A black Republican and a black Democrat walk into an old church in Virginia… 
 
It sounds like the first line of a bad joke, but it was the start of an insightful conversation Sunday in Charlottesville, Va., which is still grappling with the fallout of August’s white supremacist, pro-Confederacy protests.
 
Into a former church-turned-homeless shelter came Donna Brazile, the first African-American woman to chair the Democratic National Committee, and Michael Steele, the first and only African-American chairman of the Republican National Committee.
 
The conversation between the two was sponsored by the Common Ground Committee , whose mission is to “bring light, not heat, to public discourse,” and supported by The Christian Science Monitor and Listen First Charlottesville as part of the National Week of Conversation. 
 
As moderator, I knew going in I’d be in the midst of legends: As Al Gore’s campaign manager, Ms. Brazile was the first woman to run a presidential campaign. Mr. Steele, the former lieutenant governor in Maryland, was the first African-American elected to statewide office there. 
 
I came prepared to prod these big personalities away from opposite sides of the aisle and into some negotiated common ground. On what could they agree?
  
Almost everything, as it turns out. The topics ranged from the government’s role in the political structure to its role in criminal justice and economic equality. The two agreed on the problems and had few differences in their proposed solutions. 
 
I was struck by how in sync they were, but maybe I shouldn’t have been.
 
Brazile and Steele are longtime friends, from the same generation and with a shared Catholic faith. They credit their solid upbringing for their successes. 
 
From where I sat, it felt as if their positive energy flooded the room, which held both pain and promise. 
 
In the back sat Susan Bro, the mother of Heather Heyer, who was killed last August when a driver barreled his car into a crowd of counterprotesters. Ms. Heyer was the only fatality of that weekend’s protests. 
  
Ms. Bro came on stage after the conversation ended. I offered to usher her past the throngs waiting to meet Brazile and Steele, but she said as a teacher, she wasn’t one to cut lines. 
 
Her grief was palpable as she talked to me about continuing her daughter’s legacy through the Heather Heyer Foundation.
 
Then I met Renaldo Pearson, a senior adviser to the faculty deans and social engineer-in-residence at Harvard University. Mr. Pearson is a leader in the Democracy Spring, whose goal is to fix the role of big money in politics and protect voting rights. He wants to dismantle the political status quo – and he’s so electric and engaging, you can see how he just might do it. 
 
I am a skeptic bordering on a cynic, but there was a passion and purpose in the room that inspired me. There’s the angry, bitter politics we see on CNN, Fox, MSNBC, as well as in 280-character bursts on Twitter. 
 
But Sunday, I was reminded that behind the politics are people. Sometimes, those people genuinely like and respect each other. And when they do, it’s not hard to find common ground. 

Wendi is a Monitor contributor who graciously accepted the Monitor’s invitation to moderate the Charlottesville event. She is editor and publisher of MLK50: Justice Through Journalism and was a 2016 fellow at the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. You can read her work for the Monitor here and here.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.