Self-driving cars face more obstacles than the ones on the road

Safety advocates are still holding up a 'stop' sign as lawmakers work to expand the self-driving car market in the US.

Tony Avelar/AP
Google's self-driving Lexus car drives along street during a demonstration at Google campus in Mountain View, Calif. A Senate panel plans to take up a bill Oct. 4, 2017, intended to clear away obstacles to a new era in which cars drive themselves. Safety advocates said it would give automakers free reign to put unsafe vehicles on the road.

A bill to clear away obstacles to a new era of self-driving cars is facing opposition from safety advocates who say it would give automakers free rein to put unsafe vehicles on the road.

A Senate panel is scheduled to take up the measure on Wednesday. It would allow automakers to apply for exemptions to current federal auto safety standards in order to sell up to 50,000 self-driving cars and light trucks per manufacturer in the first year after passage. Up to 75,000 per manufacturer could be sold in the second year, and 100,000 each year thereafter.

Action by the full Senate is still required and differences with a similar bill passed by the House would have to be worked out before the measure could become law.

Industry officials said the bill would be a boon to safety since an estimated 94 percent of crashes involve human error, as well as have a profound impact on the lives of the disabled.

"Not taking action now could potentially delay life-saving technologies," said Wade Newton, a spokesman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.

But Joan Claybrook, a former head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) under President Jimmy Carter, said the bill is one of the "biggest assaults" ever on the landmark 1966 law that empowered the federal government to set auto safety standards.

"The public will be the crash dummies in this experiment," she told reporters on a telephone conference call with safety advocates.

Under the bill, the NHTSA would have 180 days after an application in which to grant or deny the exemption. Manufacturers are supposed to show that they can provide an equivalent of safety, but six months isn't enough time for an agency that is undermanned and lacks expertise in self-driving technology to effectively make such determinations, safety advocates said.

The bill is broad enough to permit exemptions to standards that protect occupants in a crash, like air bags, safety advocates said.

The bill also allows manufacturers to make equipment like steering wheels and brakes inoperable when automated driving systems are in use without having to apply for an exemption.

There are no federal safety standards for many of the technologies that are at the heart of self-driving cars, like software and sensors, and there is no sign that the Trump administration would create such standards. Rather, administration, auto, and technology industry officials have suggested that new regulations would be unable to keep up with rapid developments in technology and would slow deployment of self-driving cars.

The bill pre-empts state and local governments from enacting their own safety standards in the absence of federal standards. Industry officials have complained that being forced to comply with a "patchwork" of state safety laws would be unmanageable. States would still be responsible for licensing vehicles and enforcing traffic laws.

"We shouldn't compromise federal and state protections that have enhanced auto safety for decades in the pursuit to bring these cars to market," said David Friedman, a former NHTSA acting administrator during the Obama administration.

Automakers have experienced the largest number of recalls for safety defects in the industry's history in recent years. General Motors, for example, was found to have buried evidence of an ignition switch defect that ultimately caused the recall of 2.6 million small cars worldwide. The switches played a role in at least 124 deaths and 275 injuries.

Also, about 70 million defective Takata air bag inflators are being recalled in the United States.  The inflators are responsible for up to 19 deaths worldwide and more than 180 injures.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Self-driving cars face more obstacles than the ones on the road
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today