In Iowa, more constituents flood a GOP town hall to protest Trump policies

Sen. Joni Ernst (R) of Iowa faced a sea of frustrated constituents at a town hall Friday. She's just one of many GOP legislators to face backlash for what voters see as complacency in the Trump agenda. 

Charlie Neibergall/AP
Sen. Joni Ernst (R) of Iowa speaks during a town hall meeting, Friday, at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa. It was one of two meetings that day where she faced confrontational crowds.

Sen. Joni Ernst (R) of Iowa jostled with a tense crowd of constituents Friday, becoming the latest GOP leader to field criticism over what voters see as dangerous complacency under President Trump’s agenda.

Speaking at a town hall at Coe College in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Senator Ernst was met by angry constituents who booed her responses to questions about Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, climate change, and healthcare policy.

“She supports all types of education. I support all types of education,” she said, answering a question from a concerned educator regarding Ms. DeVos’s nomination and eventual confirmation.

The meeting was one of two Ms. Ernst held that day, the second in Des Moines. At both, she faced similar backlash. 

“I am a strong believer in public education,” she said, speaking over a loud chorus of boos from the audience in Cedar Rapids. “Public education is very important in Iowa, but I also believe there are parents who have to make tough choices for their children.”

As a member of Congress, Ernst told the crowd that she and her fellow legislators “will hold her accountable.”

But that assurance wasn’t enough to quell the audience’s angst. Since Mr. Trump’s inauguration nearly two months ago, Democrats have ramped up resistance efforts to policies regarding immigration. They have flooded their representatives with calls and emails, donated to causes under threat of losing funding, and held protests of historic scale.

And they’ve also taken the conversation directly to their representatives at contentious town halls.

Last month, Rep. Tom McClintock (R) of California had police escort him out of a town hall after he said the rowdy crowd had an “anarchist element” that proved threatening, although the protesters did not resort to violence.

And just last week, Texas Rep. Joe Barton (R) told a man in the audience to “shut up” as he continued to yell criticisms of the congressman’s vote on a bill regarding women and domestic violence.

In some states, the meetings have become so volatile that representatives have elected to hold fewer.

Many have drawn parallels between the surge in unruly meetings and the conservative tea party movement that arose after the election of President Barack Obama. While anger on the right spurred a Congressional shift in the 2010 midterm elections and allowed Republicans to gain seats in the House and Senate and at the state level, experts say the town halls themselves weren’t constructive venues for pushing elected representatives to vote closer to constituents’ views.

"These meetings are really a part of a larger effort – in and of themselves, they don't create change," Trevor Parry-Giles, a communications professor at the University of Maryland who studies political campaigns and political rhetoric, told The Christian Science Monitor last month. "But they can be an indication of public sentiment that may culminate in real electoral change."

Friday’s town hall wasn’t a complete ideological clash. Ernst received applause when she aired concerns with Trump’s administration’s seemingly close ties to Russia and his opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

She also said she believed Trump should release his tax returns, becoming one of the first top GOP officials to do so.

I think he should,” Ernst said.

That sentiment was met not only by cheers, but with a standing ovation from the crowd.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.