'West Wing' cast stumps for Hillary – but do celebrities actually help?

The show's final episode aired more than 10 years ago. How politically effective could its cast members prove?

James Sorensen/NBC Handout/Reuters
The NBC television series 'West Wing,' featuring, left to right, Richard Schiff, Allison Janney, Dule Hill, John Spencer, Martin Sheen, Rob Lowe, Janel Moloney, and Brad Whitford shown in an undated publicity photo.

Six cast members from the seven-season hit political drama “The West Wing” will join Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton on the campaign trail this weekend in Ohio.

Calling on the support of familiar Hollywood faces has become common practice for American politicians, but how effective will the tactic prove this time, especially since the show’s final episode aired more than a decade ago?

Aaron Sorkin, who created the series and served as lead writer for more than half of its run, said video-streaming services have introduced the storyline to younger audiences.

“Thanks to Netflix, it’s not that the show has had a longer life. It’s that the show has been completely born again,” Mr. Sorkin told Entertainment Weekly. “College kids, high school kids are watching the show like it’s brand new.”

Eric Kasper, an assistant professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, told The Christian Science Monitor in July that the current presidential election has been more personality-driven than most.

It makes sense for both Ms. Clinton and Republican candidate Donald Trump to rely on celebrities to bolster their popularity, since both have such high unfavorable ratings, Dr. Kasper added.

But having celebrity friends and allies does not necessarily translate into political clout, Michael Cobb, a North Carolina State University associate professor of political science, told The Boston Globe last October.

“Celebrities are really good at getting attention. They can create a celebrity-like environment in which people get pumped up,” Dr. Cobb said, noting that not all celebrities are credible. “In fact, very few celebrities are seen as credible.”

While the actors in “The West Wing” may not offer much credibility, as their political experience on the White House set was scripted, perhaps Clinton’s campaign stands to gain by drawing comparisons between herself and the dynamic behind-the-scenes politics in the fictional administration of Jed Bartlet as portrayed by Martin Sheen.

“Our show looked at politics through a very romantic lens and very idealized lens,” Sorkin said during his Entertainment Weekly interview. “The show kind of got away with earnestness because the characters were so charming, so good at their jobs, and their purpose was good.”

Bradley Whitford, who played White House Deputy Chief of Staff Josh Lyman, jumped in to note that there’s an element of reality baked into the show’s drama.

“I used to get defensive about the accusation that it was a fantasy,” Mr. Whitford said. “I guarantee you that Bill Clinton and George Bush were surrounded by people who understand that politics is the way to create your moral vision.”

Whitford will be joined at campaign events in Ohio by Richard Schiff, who played communications director Toby Ziegler; Allison Janney, who played press secretary C. J. Cregg; Dulé Hill, who played Charlie Young; Joshua Malina, who played Will Bailey; and Mary McCormack, who played Kate Harper.

The six will take part in organizing events in the Mahoning Valley, Cleveland, Sandusky, and Toledo on Saturday, followed by stops in Dayton and Columbus areas on Sunday, the campaign said, as Variety reported.

The deadline to register to vote in Ohio is Oct. 11.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'West Wing' cast stumps for Hillary – but do celebrities actually help?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today