N.H. Union Leader picks Johnson over Trump. But will it matter?

In spite of its century-long record of endorsing Republican candidates, the Manchester-based daily newspaper has backed Libertarian Gary Johnson.

Scott Morgan/ AP/ File
Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson speaks during a campaign rally in Des Moines, Iowa, on Sept. 3, 2016.

Presidential candidate Gary Johnson has a prominent new advocate in his corner.

The Union Leader of Manchester, N.H., endorsed the Libertarian – and denounced Republican candidate Donald Trump, as well as Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton – in an editorial published on Wednesday evening. The editorial, which continues the election year feud between Mr. Trump and Union Leader publisher Joseph McQuaid, ends the daily newspaper's century-long streak of Republican endorsements.

"Gary Johnson and Bill Weld are on the ballot in all 50 states," writes Mr. McQuaid. "Their records (as Republican governors in politically-divided states) speak well of them. They would be worth considering under many circumstances. In today's dark times, they are a bright light of hope and reason."

In every presidential election of the past hundred years, the Union Leader has backed the Republican ticket – even when it didn't necessarily want to. In 1972, then-publisher William Loeb reluctantly asked voters to re-elect Richard Nixon. So it's a big deal, in the scope of the paper's history, that it has now declared support for the Libertarian candidate.

Mr. Johnson, the former governor of New Mexico, commands 13 percent of votes in a late August poll from Quinnipiac University, compared with 41 percent for Mrs. Clinton, 39 percent for Mr. Trump, and 4 percent for Green Party candidate Jill Stein. He is making a final push to appear at the presidential debates, even taking out a full-page ad on Wednesday in The New York Times, asking to be included. 

"Put a third podium on stage for the debate scheduled on September 26th. Allow us to make our case to the American people," write Johnson and his running mate, former Massachusetts governor Bill Weld. 

But will the Union Leader's support matter for Johnson?

New Hampshire, fluid and complex in its political landscape, will be hard-won for whichever candidate takes it. An endorsement won't immediately sway voters, most of whom also have access to innumerable other news sources. But endorsements can persuade them to take a closer look at a campaign.

When the Union Leader endorsed New Jersey governor Chris Christie for the Republican primaries in November, former New Hampshire GOP chairman Fergus Cullen told The Christian Science Monitor that people "aren't going to vote for Christie because the Union Leader endorsed him. But they will say, 'Boy, maybe I ought to take another look at this guy.' That's why it's really helpful. It gives cover to others to come on board."

Often, however, that's not enough. Despite the Union Leader's support, Governor Christie lost the Republican primary. It wasn't close, either – Trump won 11 delegates in the state, while Mr. Christie won none.

In politically precarious swing states, endorsements could even backfire, if support from a newspaper perceived to have a certain leaning turns off on-the-fence voters. 

"Newspaper endorsements have a muddy record," Dianne Bystrom, a political scientist at Iowa State University, told the Monitor's Linda Feldmann. "They can help sometimes, and hurt with others."

The Union Leader makes Johnson's third endorsement from a major paper, joining the Winston-Salem Journal and the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to N.H. Union Leader picks Johnson over Trump. But will it matter?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today