Trump's explanation for spreading false info? It's just 'a retweet.'

Donald Trump has repeatedly said he would act differently as president than as a candidate. 

|
(AP Photo/John Locher)
Supporters of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump recite the Pledge of Allegiance during a campaign rally Monday, Feb. 22, 2016, in Las Vegas.

Donald Trump has repeated inaccurate and racially charged crime statistics, reposted pledges of support from white supremacists and retweeted dubious questions about the citizenship of his presidential rivals to an online following of more than 6 million people on Twitter alone.

His response when challenged? To dismiss it all as nothing more than harmless "retweets."

Unlike any presidential candidate before him, Trump has fueled his campaign for the Republican nomination with a seemingly endless series of eyebrow-raising statements. It's a strategy unavailable to a conventional politician but seemingly tailor-made for the billionaire businessman, TV celebrity and master marketer.

"We've gone from a 24-hour news cycle to a 24-second news cycle," said GOP consultant Kevin Madden. "So right when you think Trump is about to endure a concentrated level of scrutiny for a false statement or the latest outrage, he is on to the next controversy."

Yet Trump's pattern of repeating things that are false, or just unseemly, and then refusing to take responsibility, would undoubtedly pose a challenge should he move into the White House — where a president's casual utterance or late-night tweet could move financial markets or spark a diplomatic incident.

Trump's latest example came on Saturday, hours before he won the South Carolina GOP primary to cement his status as the Republican presidential front-runner. He quoted a supporter on Twitter who was questioning rival Marco Rubio's eligibility to run for president, even though the Florida senator was born in the U.S.

"It's a SLAM DUNK CASE!! Check it!" read the tweet, which linked to a video on a conservative website featuring an unidentified woman arguing that only people who with American parents qualify as "natural born." Rubio's parents were immigrants from Cuba who didn't become naturalized citizens until a few years after his birth.

Asked about the retweet in an interview on ABC's "This Week" the next day, Trump said he hadn't given the issue much thought.

"Honestly, I've never looked at it," he said. "Somebody said he's not. And I retweeted it. I have 14 million people between Twitter and Facebook and Instagram, and I retweet things and we start dialogue and it's very interesting."

Unabashed, Trump said, "Maybe that's why I have 14 million people" following him and others "have 200 people."

He used the same explanation earlier this month after he retweeted, then promptly deleted, a message from the account of a neo-Nazi, and in November, when he retweeted false crime statistics that dramatically overstated the number of whites killed by blacks.

"Bill, am I gonna check every statistic?" he told Fox News host Bill O'Reilly. "All it was is a retweet. It wasn't from me."

Trump has even taken to using the explanation for comments he makes in person. Asked about his decision to repeat the shouts of a supporter who called Texas Sen. Ted Cruz a "pussy" at a Trump rally the night before New Hampshire's primary, Trump replied: "It was like a retweet. I would never say a word like that."

His rivals aren't impressed.

"This is a game he plays. He says something that's edgy and outrageous, and then the media flocks and covers that and then no one else can get any coverage on anything else," Rubio said this past Sunday on ABC's "This Week."

Trump's brand, built on the premise that he's the tell-it-like-it-is candidate, appears to have inoculated him from the consequences another candidate might face.

"You're talking about conventional wisdom and you're talking about conventional campaign tactics in an unconventional campaign cycle," said Hogan Gidley, who served as a top aide to Mike Huckabee's recently suspended campaign. "Those things just don't matter. They're so small in the big scheme of things that I don't think anything like that is going to catch up to Donald Trump."

As The Christian Science Monitor's Peter Grier writes, outrageous statements are part of Trump's brand, while other candidates are held to a different standard.

His persona is authenticity, strong leadership – and the opposite of political correctness. As Washington Post writer Chris Cillizza put it on Monday, Trump’s “willingness to say anything, no matter the underlying facts, seems to affirm to his supporters just how ‘independent’ of the political system he really is.”

But what if Trump wins the White House? While President Barack Obama is typically careful with his language, some of his more candid moments have underscored the power of a president's every word.

In the closing moments of a 2009 news conference, Obama was asked about the arrest of a black Harvard professor at the professor's home. The president inflamed the debate by saying the police acted "stupidly" — one of Trump's favorite words.

The issue consumed the White House for days, overshadowing Obama's planned agenda and leading the president to host a "beer summit" for the professor and arresting officer.

In 2012, it was a moment of private candor that caused the White House heartburn. During a meeting with then-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, an open microphone caught Obama saying he would have more "flexibility" on the issue of missile defense after his re-election.

The comment led Republicans to raise questions about what other promises Obama was making for the time when he no longer had to worry about facing voters.

For his part, Trump has repeatedly said he would act differently as president than as a candidate — including on social media.

"If you become president, it has to be toned down a lot. I fully understand that," he said in South Carolina last week. "I'm an intelligent person. I'll tone it down a lot."

___

Associated Press writer Julie Pace contributed to this report from Washington

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Trump's explanation for spreading false info? It's just 'a retweet.'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2016/0223/Trump-s-explanation-for-spreading-false-info-It-s-just-a-retweet.
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe