New Hampshire: What to watch for in the primary vote

This week, the Granite State welcomes would-be presidents and delivers its verdict. What to watch for.

Jim Young/Reuters/File
A supporter of U.S. Republican presidential candidate and Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker (no longer in the race) arrives for his campaign kickoff rally in Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States, July 13, 2015.

Iowa set the scene, and so the race began in earnest. This week, New Hampshire voters will have their chance to weigh in on the ambitions of would-be presidents.

What does the Granite State hold in store for the various 2016 candidates?

Marco Rubio

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio came third in Iowa’s Republican race, yet many observers saw his finish as a victory. Indeed, Ted Cruz’s team sarcastically quipped that “bronze is the new gold”.

Yet Mr. Rubio is treading carefully, particularly keen to avoid a confrontation with Donald Trump until the field of candidates has narrowed.

When the time comes and it’s appropriate, we’ll do so,” Rubio said, according to The Washington Post, when talking of taking on Mr. Trump more forcefully.

“I’m not running against any of the other candidates in this race,” Rubio said. “I am running for president.”

But as the pressure mounts on some of the other Republican candidates, Saturday’s GOP debate could turn nasty. Rubio may be unable to stay as aloof as he might like.

A good showing Tuesday may force the field to winnow. A poor showing for Rubio in New Hampshire could extend the race.  

Clinton grapples with controversy

Can Hillary Clinton begin to regain some trust, as she does battle in New Hampshire?

Plagued by an interminable saga of secret e-mails stored on her personal computer, allegations of coziness with Wall Street and other challenges to her integrity, Mrs. Clinton will be doing all she can to change the narrative, shift the focus.

Yet there is little expectation of her winning in New Hampshire. But if she succeeds in narrowing the big lead of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, she might spin that as a shift in momentum. Most polls still show Sanders with a double digit lead. 

Ted Cruz again?

Iowa was a tricky vote to predict. In the end, not a few were surprised by the victory of Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, the defeat of Mr. Trump, and the humble manner in which Trump accepted his silver medal.

But that now lies in history. Looking forward, Mr. Cruz will have a mighty struggle to repeat his efforts in Iowa, a state saturated by Evangelical Christians. Most New Hampshire polls show Cruz in a crowded race for third, behind Rubio and Trump. 

Will Cruz let Trump coast to victory and focus his attacks on Rubio in an effort to secure a second place finish?

What New Hampshire means for Sanders

Many political observers initially dismissed Sanders, saying he didn't have a real chance at keeping up with Clinton.

Yet in New Hampshire, he has an opportunity to consolidate his near-victory in Iowa and emerge as a true contender. National polls still give Clinton a solid lead, but if Sanders does well in Tuesday's primary, it could boost his prospects in South Carolina and Nevada, where the more ethnically diverse population favors Clinton.

The other Republicans

The Grand Old Party has a field of candidates far more cluttered and confused than its rival. But New Hampshire will likely begin the process of paring it down.

Two governors, Chris Christie of New Jersey and John Kasich of Ohio, one ex-governor, Jeb Bush, and a neurosurgeon, Ben Carson are the Republican outsiders most likely to stay in the pack.

But New Hampshire is unlikely to give all of the Republican contenders a pass to the next stage. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.