Poor screening: Two Iraqi refugees Republicans use as an example

Two Iraqi refugees living in Kentucky were jailed for plotting to send sniper rifles, Stinger missiles and money to Al Qaida operatives in Iraq.

(Daily News via AP)
Iraqi refugee Waad Ramadan Alwan, left, of Bowling Green, who is facing terrorism charges, arrives at the William H. Natcher Federal Courthouse for a detention hearing in Bowling Green, Ky. in June 2011. From a Kentucky college town, Alwan and Mohanad Shareef Hammadi, Iraqi refugees, plotted to send sniper rifles, Stinger missiles and money to al-Qaida operatives waging an insurgency back home against U.S. troops. The scheme was foiled and both are in prison, but the case has left jitters about whether terrorists might slip in among Syrian refugees resettling in the U.S.

From a Kentucky college town, two Iraqi refugees plotted to send sniper rifles, Stinger missiles and money to al-Qaida operatives waging an insurgency back home against U.S. troops. The scheme was foiled and both are in prison, but the case has left jitters about whether extremists might slip in among Syrian refugees resettling in the U.S.

The two men had been involved in insurgent attacks in Iraq before arriving in Bowling Green, Kentucky, in 2009 as part of a U.S. program to help displaced Iraqis. Their plan unraveled when they teamed up with an FBI informant, leading to their 2011 arrest.

Neither Waad Ramadan Alwan nor Mohanad Shareef Hammadi was charged with plotting to launch attacks inside the U.S., and authorities said their weapons and money never made it to Iraq. But their plotting in a middle-American city of 61,000 has given ammunition to opponents of allowing Syrian refugees into the U.S. following the deadly attacks last week in Paris.

Sen. Rand Paul, who is vying for the Republican presidential nomination, pointed to the case in his hometown this week while touting legislation to block President Barack Obama's goal of bringing 10,000 additional Syrian refugees to the U.S.

Some lawmakers pointed to a Syrian passport found with the body of one of the Paris suicide bombers as a reminder of the risks, but a top German security official later said the passport might have been a fake intended to stoke fears about refugees.

Paul's Kentucky GOP colleague, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, said the case proves that "the ability to vet people coming from that part of the world is really quite limited. And so that's why I, for one, don't feel particularly comforted by the assertion that our government can vet these refugees."

McConnell has called for "a pause" in allowing Syrian refugees into the U.S. What's needed, the Kentucky Republican said, is a strategy "to give the refugees an opportunity to stay in their own country."

As The Christian Science Monitor reports, on Tuesday, House Speaker Paul Ryan also called for a “pause” in Syrian refugees coming to the United States. Some Republicans are threatening a budget showdown over the issue. Administration officials will motor to the Hill this week for hearings.

Since Sunday, more than half of state governors – mostly GOP, and one Democrat – have rushed to announce that their states would be closed to any Syrian refugees. Republican presidential candidates lost no time in quickly denouncing the program.

The case of the two Iraqis did raise questions about the government's process for clearing refugees for migration to the U.S., and it led to "a pretty vigorous effort to really use all available information that the federal government has to do extensive vetting," said Christian Beckner, deputy director of a homeland security program at George Washington University.

"This case was an example of the vulnerabilities that existed in the system at the time, some of which has been addressed as a result of this experience," said Beckner, a former staff member of the U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. "Efforts were made to improve the screening system as a result of this case, which will be helpful for screening Syrian refugees."

Those seeking to enter the U.S. through the Refugee Admissions Program now undergo extensive screening that includes in-person interviews, biometric screening and background checks through the databases of U.S. intelligence and national security agencies. The process typically lasts between 18 and 24 months, though it can often be longer for those seeking to relocate from such war-torn countries as Iraq and Syria.

The U.S. Justice Department said Wednesday it doesn't track how many people approved through that screening process were later arrested on charges related to extremist activities.

The Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, says that of the 784,000 refugees cleared for resettlement in the United States after Sept. 11, 2001, only the two Iraqis in Kentucky and a third man from Uzbekistan were later arrested for planning violent acts. Of the roughly 2,200 Syrians admitted to the United States as refugees since the start of the civil war in 2011, none has been arrested on such charges, according to the institute.

Hammadi and Alwan pleaded guilty to taking part in a plot to ship thousands of dollars in cash, machine guns, rifles, grenades and shoulder-fired missiles from Kentucky to al-Qaida in Iraq in 2010 and 2011. Hammadi is serving a life sentence, and Alwan, who prosecutors called an experienced militant, received a 40-year prison sentence.

Federal officials already had evidence of Alwan's ties to the Iraq insurgency from a fingerprint on a roadside bomb found in 2005, but it didn't stop him from entering the U.S. as a refugee four years later. Federal investigators starting tracking Alwan after discovering he had been held in an Iraqi prison. The fingerprint match was made later and used as evidence in the case against him.

During the investigation, Alwan unwittingly worked with the FBI informant, drew diagrams of roadside bomb models and boasted about attacks on American troops in Iraq.

Beckner said one complication in checking out Syrian refugees is that the U.S. had a major military presence that could assist with the vetting in Iraq, a factor that's missing in Syria. Without reliable intelligence on the ground in Syria, it's more difficult to protect against someone bent on violence or supporting a militant cause, he said.

Another complication is the "combination of technology and radicalism," since refugees, unlike in past decades, can stay in close touch with what's going on in their homeland, said Charles Rose, a criminal and military law professor at Stetson Law School in Gulfport, Florida.

Rose, a former Army intelligence officer and a judge advocate general, said: "So there is now an ability for elements outside the United States to continue to have a great deal of virtual presence in the lives of recent immigrants and refugees."


Associated Press writer Michael Biesecker contributed to this report from Washington.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Poor screening: Two Iraqi refugees Republicans use as an example
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today