Why Ben Carson says abortion is like slavery

GOP presidential candidate Ben Carson explained his no-exception abortion beliefs Sunday, causing many to question the retired neurosurgeon and his faith as he leads the polls in Iowa. 

Mark Kauzlarich/Reuters
Republican presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson answers questions from the media at the Alpha Gamma Rohfraternity at Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa on October 24, 2015.

In an interview on NBC’s "Meet the Press" Sunday, GOP presidential candidate and retired pediatric neurosurgeon Ben Carson said he opposed abortion under all circumstances, likening the medical procedure to slavery.

After acknowledging that his comparison was controversial, Dr. Carson told host Chuck Todd, “During slavery – and I know that’s one of those worlds you’re not supposed to say, but I’m saying it – during slavery, a lot of the slave owners thought that they had the right to do whatever they wanted to that slave. Anything that they chose to do. And what if abolitionists had said: ‘You know, I don’t believe in slavery. I think it’s wrong, but you guys do whatever you want to do? Where would we be?”

Carson further explained that Roe v. Wade should be overturned – with no exceptions. When asked about controversial cases involving rape or incest, he said “I would not be in favor of killing a baby because the baby came about in that way,” citing “the many stories of people who have led very useful lives who were the result of rape or incest.” 

And if the pregnancy caused the mother’s life to be in danger, Carson said “there’s room to discuss” terminating the pregnancy, but such cases are “an extraordinarily rare situation.”

By comparing abortion to slavery, Carson suggests that both practices deny humans their fundamental rights. “We’ve allowed the purveyors of the vision to make mothers think that that baby is their enemy and that they have a right to kill it. Can you see how perverted that line of thinking is?” Carson asks in the interview.

But this is not the first time Carson has used a slavery analogy to explain his political beliefs. In a 2013 speech, Carson gained the support of conservative activists when he said: “You know Obamacare is really, I think, the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery. And it is – in a way, it is slavery, in a way, because it is making all of us subservient to the government.”

Carson is a practicing Seventh-Day Adventist, a source of his stance against gay marriage. But Carson seems to take a stronger stance against abortion than what the religion preaches. The Seventh-Day Adventist Church suggests abortions may be appropriate “for the most serious reasons,” such as the mother’s health, rape, or incest, but the decision to end a life “must not be thoughtlessly destroyed” and the decision is ultimately between the mother and God.

“Therefore, any attempts to coerce women either to remain pregnant or to terminate pregnancy should be rejected as infringements of personal freedom,” the church explains.

Carson has talked about the importance of his religion on the campaign trail, a subject his top competitor Donald Trump continues to criticize.

But Carson's views on abortion and religion appear to be helping him in Iowa. A recent Des Moines Register/Bloomberg Politics poll shows Carson as a favorite among Iowa caucus voters with 28 percent support, ahead of the national GOP frontrunner Trump’s 19 percent.

In Iowa, 89 percent of likely caucus goers in this poll are attracted to the retired neurosurgeon’s statements that he would be guided by his faith in God while president.

“What’s interesting is that the moral outsider (Carson) is whipping the businessman-not-politician-outsider (Trump) and crushing the hope-and-change insiders (Bush and Rubio),” GOP strategist Alex Castellanos told the Des Moines Register. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Ben Carson says abortion is like slavery
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today