More than 300 of Hillary Clinton's emails may have classified data

Up to 305 messages in Hillary Clinton's private email server could contain classified information and require further review, the State Department said Monday.

Charlie Neibergall/AP Photo/File
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks at the Iowa State Fair in Des Moines, Iowa on Aug. 15, 2015. The State Department review of Clinton's emails so far has found as many as 305 messages that could contain classified information and require further review by federal agencies, the department said Monday.

The State Department review of Hillary Rodham Clinton's emails so far has found as many as 305 messages that could contain classified information and require further scrutiny by federal agencies, the department said Monday.

In a court filing that was part of a lawsuit against the State Department, officials told a federal judge in Washington they would be able to meet an existing schedule to release copies of Mrs. Clinton's emails because only about 5 percent of the messages reviewed so far contain possible secret information that could hold them back for further analysis. The agency said those 305 emails with potential classified data were among more than 1,500 documents analyzed so far.

The filing came after Clinton said in an Iowa radio interview that during her stint as secretary of state in the Obama administration, she had never sent or received any emails on her private server that had information clearly marked classified. Republican critics have warned that Clinton may have compromised national security by sending and receiving messages that contained secret information, but she has sloughed off the criticism, saying she followed security guidelines and is the one who made the previously withheld emails available to the American public.

"If I had not asked for my emails all to be made public, none of this would have been in the public arena," she said in the interview, recorded last Friday. But The Associated Press and other news organizations had sought copies of Clinton's emails under the US Freedom of Information Act for years.

The email controversy has proven a major distraction for Clinton as she campaigns for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016. Republicans hope it will cause voters to view her as untrustworthy. It has also left an opening for her rivals in the Democratic race, including her main challenger Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. If Clinton seems vulnerable that might lead other candidates such as Vice President Joe Biden to enter the race.

The AP was first to identify Clinton's private email server and trace it in March to her family's home in New York. The server was surrendered to the FBI last week, months after Clinton said it was her personal property and wouldn't be turned over.

Clinton said in March that she had exchanged about 60,000 emails during her four years in the Obama administration, about half of which were personal and deleted. She turned over the others to the State Department, which is reviewing and releasing them on a monthly basis. Clinton campaign officials did not respond Monday to an emailed request for comment about the court filing about her correspondence.

The State Department has censored some of Clinton's emails for national security reasons before they were publicly released. The government blacked-out all or parts of those messages under a provision of the Freedom of Information Act intended to protect material that had been deemed and properly classified for purposes of national defense or foreign policy.

Last month, the inspector general for the State Department warned that some of the information that passed through Clinton's home-based private server was classified information produced by the US intelligence community. It's generally not possible to forward or cut-and-paste an email marked classified to a private account because classified email systems are closed to outsiders. But it can be illegal to paraphrase or retype classified information from a secure email into an unprotected message sent to a personal address.

The State Department acknowledgement that 305 Clinton emails were being reviewed for possible national security concerns came as part of legal sparring in a lawsuit against the agency by journalist Jason Leopold, a reporter with Vice News. In January, Mr. Leopold sued the agency to quickly produce Clinton emails and other documents that were sought under a freedom of information request dating back to 2014.

Leopold's case is one of several pending against the State Department for Clinton records. The AP also sued the agency this year for failing to turn over copies of emails and other documents since mid-2013 and in one case, back to 2010. In both cases, US district court judges have pressed the State Department to produce records on a firm schedule.

But Leopold's lawyers have raised concerns that the intelligence review of Clinton's emails has bogged down the schedule of release ordered previously by US District Judge Rudolph Contreras. Leopold's lawyer said the department missed its July target by more than 1,000 pages of emails, in part because of screening by five intelligence agencies.

State Department lawyers said that despite the growing number of Clinton emails that will have to be forwarded to intelligence agencies for review, the government was confident that the low number – 5.1 percent of the total – would not slow down public release of the emails.

Associated Press writer Bradley Klapper contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to