Alone in GOP field, Rand Paul vows to end Patriot Act

Rand Paul recently came out in support of ending the US Patriot Act, a move that distinguishes him from other GOP candidates. 

Charlie Neibergall/AP
Republican presidential candidate Sen. Rand Paul speaks in Des Moines on Saturday.

Republican presidential candidate Rand Paul girded for a fight in Congress that could pit the Kentucky senator against some of his presidential rivals as he called on Washington to end a sweeping domestic-surveillance program.

Standing in front of Independence Hall, a symbol of individual freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, Paul said on Monday he would do all he could to prevent Congress from allowing the FBI and the NSA to continue to collect Americans' telephone records in bulk.

"Our Founding Fathers would be appalled to know that we are writing one single warrant and collecting everyone's phone records all the time," Paul said.

Paul acknowledged he didn't have the votes in Congress to kill the program, but he said he would push for a full debate as the Senate considers whether to scale it back.

The program is due to expire at the end of the month.

The debate could highlight divisions in the Republican presidential field between the libertarian-leaning senator and some of his more hawkish rivals over the reach of the government's spying powers.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz has said he supports a compromise that would scale back the surveillance program, which passed the House of Representatives by a wide margin earlier this month and is also backed by the Obama administration.

Florida Senator Marco Rubio, another presidential candidate, wants to keep the program intact. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, who is weighing a 2016 presidential bid, said Monday he wants to see the Patriot Act extended without conditions.

The surveillance program was made possible by the USA Patriot Act, which gave the government broad tools to investigate terrorism after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. It was conducted in secret until former government contractor Edward Snowden made it public in 2013.

A U.S. appeals court ruled the program illegal earlier this month but did not require the government to stop it.

A high-profile fight over the bulk collection program could enhance Paul's national profile. He won widespread notice in 2013 when he spoke for nearly 13 hours on the floor of the Senate to criticize the Obama administration's use of drones.

Paul has made civil liberties a cornerstone of his unorthodox presidential bid, arguing that his fellow Republicans are not doing enough to protect constitutionally guaranteed rights to privacy and justice.

"The Republican Party is a great party for the Second Amendment," which allows citizens to own firearms, he said. "But the thing is, some of the other amendments are pretty important too." (Editing by Bernadette Baum)

Word Count: 428

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.