The ‘billionaire primary’: Who’s backing whom?

Mega-wealthy donors, many of them billionaires, are expected to play an unprecedented role in the 2016 presidential race. Some donate directly into the coffers of political action committees known as “super-PACs,” which make expenditures on behalf of candidates but cannot coordinate with their campaigns. A super-PAC can accept unlimited contributions from individuals.

In 2012, Republicans Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich lasted longer than expected in the primaries, because of support from wealthy benefactors, Foster Friess and Sheldon Adelson, respectively.

Others major donors work as bundlers, getting their friends to donate to their favored candidate’s campaign. Those donations are limited.

This time, some mega-donors are already backing candidates. Others are still weighing their options. Here’s a list of who’s backing whom so far:

1. Robert Mercer: Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas

Harrison McClary/Reuters
US Senator Ted Cruz (R) of Texas speaks during the National Rifle Association's annual meeting in Nashville, Tennessee April 10, 2015.

Mr. Mercer, a hedge-fund magnate, is reportedly the main donor to a network of four super-PACs all backing Senator Cruz. Within a few weeks of Cruz’s campaign launch on March 23, the pro-Cruz super-PACS, all containing the words “Keep the Promise,” had raised an eye-popping $31 million.

A recent profile in The New York Times described Mercer as a “reclusive Long Islander,” who shares with Cruz “a passion for unbridled markets, concerns about the Internal Revenue Service, and a skeptical view of climate change.” Mercer’s net worth is undisclosed. He is the co-CEO of the hedge fund Renaissance Technologies.

1 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.