Poll: Millennials turn on Obama, don't like Obamacare, either

President Obama's approval rating among Americans age 18 to 29 – so-called Millennials – is at an all-time low, with nearly half saying they'd recall him. They're down on Washington, in general.

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters/File
President Obama shakes hands at Sloopy's diner inside the student union of the Ohio State University in Columbus earlier this year. The president's approval rating has gone down among young people in the past six months.

The high hopes that many young Americans placed in Barack Obama now appear to be crashing down.

In the past six months, President Obama’s approval rating has dipped 11 points to 41 percent among 18- to 29-year-olds, the generation known as Millennials, according to a poll released Wednesday by the Institute of Politics at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass.

Along with older generations, Millennials are growing increasingly disenchanted with the way Washington is operating: Only 1 in 5 of more than 2,000 Millennials polled said they approve of the direction the country is headed, down from 1 in 4 young people surveyed in April.

But the most notable shifts in opinion focus on Mr. Obama. In perhaps the survey's most surprising finding, a near majority of Millennials – 47 percent – would support recalling the president if it were possible (it's not). Some 52 percent would recall all members of Congress.

"A critical factor in the election and reelection of Barack Obama, America's 18- to 29-year-olds now rate the president's job performance closer to that of Congress – and at the lowest level since he took office in 2009," said Trey Grayson, director of the Harvard Institute of Politics, in a press release. 

Though confidence in Obama went up during the 2012 elections, when respondents could compare him with Mitt Romney, now that the comparison is gone, noted Mr. Grayson during a conference call about the survey.

The overall disillusionment with Washington is perpetuated by a feeling among Millennials that the government is losing touch with them, the survey concludes. While young Americans are not rejecting politics per se, they are fed up with the current system, said John Della Volpe, director of polling at the Institute of Politics, on the conference call. Because there was so much support for Obama from young voters, there were higher expectations – perhaps, too high, Mr. Volpe said.

“Young Americans hold the president, Congress, and the federal government in less esteem almost by the day, and the levels of engagement they are having in politics are also on the decline,” he added. 

The Harvard survey also shows that younger Millennials, age 18 to 24, are trending less Democratic. 

While older Millennials who feel responsible for electing Obama have stuck with him, the allegiance of younger Millennials, who are now entering the job market, has started to waver, says Eva Guidarini, a Harvard junior and the student Harvard Public Opinion Project chair, during the conference call. 

Thirty-one percent of younger Millennials self-reported as Democrats, down from 36 percent in April 2013. In contrast, 38 percent of older Millennials, age 25 to 29 consider themselves to be Democrats, a 1 percentage point decrease from the last survey. 

The increasing disenchantment with the government can be seen in Millennial views on other top issues:

Health care. The Affordable Care Act has received a cool reception from Millennials, the majority of whom believe costs will rise and quality will fall. A solid majority of Millennials disapprove of the health-reform law, whether it is called the “Affordable Care Act," or as “Obamacare.”

Among the 18- to 29-year-olds currently without health insurance, less than one-third said they would be likely to enroll in the law's health-insurance exchanges when they become eligible. Thirteen percent reported they will definitely enroll, 16 percent said they will probably enroll, and 41 percent said they are split 50-50.

Government surveillance. More than half of Millennials are unsure about whether or not National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden is a "patriot" or "traitor." Some 22 percent described Mr. Snowden as a "patriot," and 22 percent said he was a "traitor," while 52 percent said they were unsure. But 31 percent said, had they been in Snowden’s place, they would not have released the documents, while 15 percent said they would have, and 50 percent were unsure.

When asked about government surveillance, 24 percent approved of the government recording web browsing history in general; 15 percent approved of the government collecting information from them personally.

Student debt. Opinions on student debt transcend party affiliation, according to the survey. Fifty-four percent of those enrolled in a four-year college said they or someone in their household currently has student loan debt. Regardless of whether or not they had debt, 57 percent of Millennials said they believe student debt is a “major problem” for young people in the United States – 62 percent of Democrats, 57 percent of Republicans, and 55 percent of independents. Seventy percent reported that financial circumstances played an important role in their decision whether or not to pursue a college education. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Poll: Millennials turn on Obama, don't like Obamacare, either
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today