John McCain: focus on flight delays shows 'upside down' sequester concerns

Sen. John McCain, speaking at a Monitor breakfast Thursday, said it is 'criminal and scandalous' that Congress is ignoring the effect of the 'sequester' on national defense.

Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor
Senator John McCain speaks at a Monitor-hosted breakfast for reporters in Washington, D.C., on Thursday.

Sen. John McCain (R) of Arizona says it is “criminal and scandalous” that Congress is ignoring the effect of budget cuts on national defense, while actively hunting for a way to offset spending cuts at the Federal Aviation Administration.

“We’ve got our priorities upside down,” Senator McCain said Thursday at a Monitor-hosted breakfast for reporters. “If we are going to take care of airline passengers, why don’t we take care of our national security? The world is a more dangerous place than I have seen ... in many respects.”

The "sequester" – the across-the-board spending cuts that took effect last month – has posed budget dilemmas for the Pentagon and other government agencies providing national security, and it has also meant delays at airports. Starting this week, the FAA has furloughed some control-tower staff, resulting in widespread flight postponements.

“I am terribly uncomfortable with the delays of FAA. I think it is a terrible thing. I have been subject to it myself,” Arizona senator said. But McCain, a decorated war hero and longtime member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, also said, “Every one of our uniformed service chiefs have said they can’t defend the nation if we continue with this sequester.”  

Sen. Charles Schumer (D) of New York, vice chair of the Senate Democratic Caucus, was also a guest at the breakfast. When asked what action should be taken regarding the FAA delays, he said, “My best solution is to undo sequester and replace it with more rational types of cuts.”  

He noted, “Last night Jay Carney, the president’s spokesperson, said that he would be open to a solution just for FAA.” The White House and top Democrats had been holding out for a comprehensive solution to the sequester as opposed to piecemeal relief.

At Wednesday’s White House briefing, Mr. Carney said that if Congress “wants to address specifically the problems caused by the sequester with the FAA, we would be open to looking at that.”

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D) of West Virginia, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee; and the panel’s ranking Republican, Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, met Wednesday with Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and FAA Administrator Michael Huerta, seeking a solution. “I would certainly be open” to any proposal they develop, Senator Schumer said.

McCain said, “I will go along with whatever the FAA thing is, but it is criminal and scandalous that we are ignoring the effect of sequestration on our national security."

Material from the Associated Press was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.