Obama birth-control proposal: Some religious groups reject revised plan

Obama birth-control plan would give women at religious nonprofits birth-control coverage through a separate insurance plan, which their employers would not pay for.

Pablo Martinez Monsivai/AP/File
In this February 2012 file photo, President Obama and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius leave the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, after the president announced the revamp of his contraception policy. The Obama administration proposed a way, Friday, Feb. 1, 2013, that women working for religious nonprofits could receive free birth-control coverage without mandating that their employers pay for it.

The Obama administration proposed a way Friday that women working for religious nonprofits could receive free birth-control coverage without mandating that their employers pay for it.

The plan, issued almost a year after a similar proposal by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), reignited the controversy over how contraception is handled in President Obama’s health-care reform. The administration faces dozens of legal challenges by religious nonprofits, including Roman Catholic schools and hospitals, which said the original plan would violate their religious liberty.

In the new proposal, women would receive birth-control coverage through a separate insurance plan that their employer would not pay for. The insurer would provide the coverage free of charge and would recoup its costs by paying a lower fee for inclusion on the health-insurance exchanges that are being set up online. Preventive care would also presumably result in lower health-care costs to insurers down the road.

“Today, the administration is taking the next step in providing women across the nation with coverage of recommended preventive care at no cost, while respecting religious concerns,” HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a statement. “We will continue to work with faith-based organizations, women's organizations, insurers, and others to achieve these goals.”

Under the previous proposal, religious groups complained that the exemption from paying for contraception was too narrow. The proposal released Friday offered a new definition of “religious employers,” following the definition used by the Internal Revenue Service, which covers all houses of worship and affiliated institutions, such as schools and hospitals.

Some religious organizations did not reject the new plan outright, while others did.

Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York, president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, reacted cautiously.

“We welcome the opportunity to study the proposed regulations closely,” Cardinal Dolan said in a statement. “We look forward to issuing a more detailed statement later.”

But the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, the legal group representing many of the religious institutions that are suing the administration, rejected the proposal.

“Today’s proposed rule does nothing to protect the religious liberty of millions of Americans,” said Kyle Duncan, general counsel at the Becket Fund. “The rights of family businesses like Hobby Lobby are still being violated,” he added, referring to a craft company whose owners have chosen, for religious reasons, not to include emergency contraception in the health insurance they offer employees.

In addition to companies whose core activity is not religious, like Hobby Lobby, the Becket Fund represents numerous religious colleges and universities in their lawsuits against the administration. Some of the cases are expected to reach the US Supreme Court.

Religious institutions that “self-insure” on health care – those that pay for health care themselves instead of contracting with an insurance company – could use a third-party administrator to obtain separate policies for employees who want birth-control coverage, HHS said.

The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) rejected HHS’s plan, saying the administration was changing the “packaging” of its proposal to try to conceal “continuity in substance.”

“This latest revision continues to compel countless employers to purchase health plans that will pay for drugs and procedures to which they are opposed on moral and religious grounds,” NRLC said in a statement.

Advocates of birth control applauded the HHS announcement. 

“This policy delivers on the promise of women having access to birth control without co-pays no matter where they work,” said Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, in a statement. “Of course, we are reviewing the technical aspects of this proposal, but the principle is clear and consistent. This policy makes it clear that your boss does not get to decide whether you can have birth control.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.