Susan Walsh/AP/File
Jack Lew listens as President Obama speaks in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington in this Jan. 9, 2012, file photo. Mr. Lew, then the budget director and currently the White House chief of staff, is Mr. Obama's expected pick to head the Treasury Department.

Jacob Lew: Is 'safe' choice for Treasury also a good choice?

Jacob Lew is valued by Obama as a Beltway numbers guy able to endure high-stakes budget fights. But some critics worry he won't tackle fast-rising debt. And the Treasury job could demand big duties beyond fiscal strategizing.

President Obama is nominating Jacob "Jack" Lew to be his next secretary of the Treasury, pushing to his administration's forefront a longtime veteran of Washington budget battles.

Mr. Lew knows the federal budget from top to bottom the way few do, even other Beltway insiders. That gives him high value to the Obama administration as it seeks to "win" epic contests, in the next few weeks and years, over the shape of big-ticket entitlement programs, other federal spending, and the US tax code.

He's widely viewed among Mr. Obama's fellow Democrats as a safe choice, a known quantity already on the administration's inside.

If confirmed by the Senate, he would succeed outgoing Secretary Timothy Geithner at at time when the nation faces growing pressure from financial markets to bring chronic federal budget deficits under control. Obama views Lew, who has already held prominent posts in the administration, as someone he can trust with this high-stakes job.

"Throughout his career, Jack Lew has proven a successful and effective advocate for middle class families who can build bipartisan consensus," a senior White House official said in a statement released Thursday morning, ahead of the president's planned announcement. The official noted that Lew has directed the Office of Management and Budget under both Obama and President Bill Clinton, "negotiating a historic agreement with Congress" in the 1990s and "leading the negotiations of the bipartisan Budget Control Act in 2011."

Lew has been serving, most recently, as White House chief of staff, a testament to Obama's confidence in his management skills.

For all the experience he brings and all the praise that's coming his way, Lew is also relatively untested in some important areas. His readiness to respond to a financial crisis, were it to occur on his watch, is unclear. And the next four years could be marked by important demands for financial leadership on the global stage, not just by maneuvering over domestic policy. 

His potential nomination has been hovering in news headlines for weeks, as Mr. Geithner's expected departure neared. During that time, his name has sparked little controversy, in contrast to concerns that have arisen surrounding Chuck Hagel, Obama's nominee for secretary of Defense. The military veteran and former US senator has been under fire for everything from positions on Israel and Iran to an alleged antigay streak.

Still, some Senate Republicans may put up forceful opposition to Lew's nomination.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R) of Alabama, for one, is firmly opposed to Lew at Treasury, claiming the nominee made "the most direct and important false assertion during my entire time in Washington" when he said Obama's budget plans would put the nation on course to stabilize the national debt. 

Senator Sessions is referring to a 2011 TV interview in which Lew said, "Our budget will get us, over the next several years, to the point where we can look the American people in the eye and say we're not adding to the debt anymore; we're spending money that we have each year...."

Financial experts widely agree that a realistic solution to America's fiscal troubles must include significant spending cuts and reforms to entitlement programs, as well as tax reforms designed to bring both added revenue and economic growth. That's a tall order under any political climate. 

Lew is known as a liberal and a staunch defender of programs that help America's poor, such as Medicaid. What remains unknown is whether he would also emerge as a successful dealmaker in an environment that has become sharply partisan. 

Some Republicans have voiced a lack of confidence in Lew as a negotiating partner, according to news reports during the recent "fiscal cliff" talks. But those comments could also be viewed as a form of praise: He's considered a shrewd bargainer.

"Jack's been around for a long time, he's a tough dude," says Tom Donohue, who heads the generally conservative US Chamber of Commerce. "I particularly like that he worked in the Congress and worked for the speaker of the House."

Lew's days in Congress date back to the earliest part of his career, when he advised Speaker Thomas "Tip" O'Neill (D) Massachusetts at a time of fiscal dealmaking with President Ronald Reagan.

Unlike some Treasury secretaries, Lew is mostly an outsider to the world of Wall Street, but he has held financial posts in the private sector. He was at Citigroup for a few years prior to Obama's election. Married and with two children, Lew calls New York City his permanent home.

Some advocates for greater regulatory vigilance over the financial sector have voiced concerns about Lew.

“The one area of concern is whether or not he is sufficiently committed to ... implementing financial reform and re-regulating Wall Street," said Dennis Kelleher, president of the nonprofit group Better Markets, in a statement Thursday. "Doing this is vital to protect the American people from Wall Street threatening our financial system again and causing another economic calamity."

The Treasury secretary chairs the nation's Financial Stability Oversight Council and will have an important role in implementing financial reforms approved by Congress during Obama's first term.

Staff writer David Grant in Washington contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Jacob Lew: Is 'safe' choice for Treasury also a good choice?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today