Immigration reform: Obama predicts action, calls to 'seize the moment'

In his first press conference since winning reelection, President Obama predicted quick action in Congress on comprehensive immigration reform after his inauguration in January.

Carolyn Kaster/AP
President Barack Obama answers a question during a news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Nov. 14.

President Obama, saying he was encouraged to see a growing “sense of empowerment and civic participation” among Latino voters in last week’s election, predicted Wednesday that there would be action on immigration reform “very soon” after his second inauguration in January.

In his first press conference since winning reelection, Mr. Obama said White House staff are already discussing legislation with members of Congress. He said he expects a bill to be introduced in Congress and acted upon soon after Inauguration Day, which is Jan. 20, 2013.

“This has not historically been a partisan issue,” Obama said, speaking in the East Room of the White House. “We've had President Bush, John McCain, and others who have supported comprehensive immigration reform in the past. So we need to seize the moment.”

Prominent Latinos had criticized Obama during the campaign for failing to enact reform during his first term, and for boosting deportations. But Obama also won kudos for using executive action to put in a place a process that allows young undocumented immigrants – so-called “DREAMers” – to avoid deportation.

Obama won 71 percent of the Latino vote last week, and his Republican challenger Mitt Romney just 27 percent, triggering among many Republicans an instant rethink of their opposition to comprehensive reform.

The headline on an analysis by the Pew Hispanic Center, released Wednesday, demonstrates the political urgency of reaching out to Latinos: “An awakened giant: the Hispanic electorate is likely to double by 2030.”

During the presidential campaign, former Governor Romney’s reference to “self-deportation” reinforced the image of the Republican Party as lacking compassion toward Hispanics who are in the United States illegally.

House Speaker John Boehner and other Republican lawmakers are now talking about moving on the issue quickly. Still, the issue of creating a path to citizenship remains problematic.

In his remarks Wednesday, Obama did not mention the words “citizenship” or “amnesty,” but he did say there should be a “pathway for legal status” for those living and working in the United States who are not engaged in criminal activity.

“It's important for them to pay back taxes, it's important for them to learn English, it's important for them to potentially pay a fine, but to give them the avenue whereby they can resolve their legal status here in this country, I think is very important,” Obama said.

The president said that his concept of “comprehensive reform” is similar to the outline of previous efforts that have sat dormant. In addition to creating a path to legal status, he said, reform should continue the border security measures that are already in place; contain “serious penalties” for companies that hire undocumented workers; and enshrine in law his new measure to help young undocumented immigrants.

The president also spoke of making it easier for both highly educated immigrants and agricultural workers to stay in the US legally.

Advocates for comprehensive immigration reform reacted positively to Obama’s remarks.

“The voices of the voters have reached Washington,” Eliseo Medina, international secretary-treasurer of the Service Employees International Union, said in a statement.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.