Republicans, Democrats dance around the 'fiscal cliff'

President Obama and Speaker Boehner want to avoid the looming 'fiscal cliff,' which will require new revenues as well as budget cuts. Can that happen without more taxes on the wealthy?

Carolyn Kaster/AP
House Speaker John Boehner and President Barack Obama walk down the steps of the Capitol in March. They'll meet this week to talk about avoiding the "fiscal cliff."

Republicans and Democrats peered over the “fiscal cliff” this week and allowed as how they might be able to get along after all – avoiding the automatic tax increases and across-the-board spending cuts due to hit January 1, rattling the economy if Congress and the White House fail to act.

At least that was the message in their post-election rhetoric, and it continued five days later on the Sunday TV talk shows.

"I am optimistic," Sen. Bob Corker, (R) of Tennessee, said on Fox News Sunday. "I think there is the basis for the deal.”

Top Obama aide David Axelrod said he had been encouraged by House Speaker John Boehner’s comments in recent days. ‘I think there are a lot of ways to skin this cat, so long as everybody comes with a positive, constructive attitude toward the task,’ he said on CBS’s Face the Nation.

Any deal, all agree, would have to include revenue increases as well as budget cuts. A key question is whether any new revenue includes changes in tax rates – specifically, an end to the Bush-era tax cuts for those earning more than $250,000, which is what President Obama has been pushing and Rep. Boehner says “no” to.

RELATED: 'Fiscal cliff?' 'Sequester?' Your guide to Congress's code language.

On Sunday, most people danced around that hot potato.

“There is a way of getting there on the revenue side,” Sen. Corker said. “The real question is: can we come to terms on the entitlement side?"

On revenues, a combination of options could include something to do with those Bush-era tax cuts, reforming the tax code, and limiting deductions.

Speaking to reporters Friday, Rep. Boehner said, “I don’t want to box myself in, and I don’t want to box anyone else in.”

So who has the upper hand?

President Obama won reelection and Democrats increased their majority in the Senate as Republicans kept their House majority (although some tea party Republican freshmen failed to win reelection).

One of Speaker Boehner’s challenges has been herding tea party types in his caucus toward some sort of bargain with the White House. That challenge remains, but the landscape and mood is different now.

“Most members were just taught a lesson that you’re not going to get everything that you want,” Rep. Tom Cole (R) of Oklahoma told the New York Times. “It was that kind of election.”

“I just believe [Boehner] will have more leeway than in the past Congress,” Rep. Peter King (R) of New York told the Times. “The election will matter.”

President Obama has danced back and forth on taxes and revenues too.

"If we're serious about reducing the deficit we have to combine spending cuts with revenue,” he said at his press event Friday. “That means asking the wealthy to pay a little more in taxes."

“A little more in taxes….” Does that mean an end to those Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy, a potential show-stopper for some Republicans?

Speaking on NBC’s Meet the Press Sunday, Sen. Charles Schumer said it’s “mathematically impossible” to get where Congress needs to without raising the tax rate on the rich. Still, he said, “If someone can show another plan that doesn't do that … we could look at it.”

In any case, things do seem to be inching toward a bigger tax bite on the wealthy.

“Look, I haven't met a wealthy Republican or Democrat in Tennessee that's not willing to contribute more as long as they know we solve the problem," Sen. Corker said Sunday.

Speaking on Fox News Sunday, conservative commentator and Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol went even farther.

"It won't kill the country if we raise taxes a little bit on millionaires," he said. "It really won't, I don't think. I don't really understand why Republicans don't take Obama's offer…. Really? The Republican Party is going to fall on its sword to defend a bunch of millionaires, half of whom voted Democratic and half of whom live in Hollywood and are hostile?"

RELATED: 'Fiscal cliff?' 'Sequester?' Your guide to Congress's code language.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Republicans, Democrats dance around the 'fiscal cliff'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2012/1111/Republicans-Democrats-dance-around-the-fiscal-cliff
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe