Does Blagojevich brother have beans to spill on Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.?

Robert Blagojevich, brother of jailed ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich of Illinois, is expected to talk this month to the House ethics panel about Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. Jackson's interest in being appointed to Obama's former US Senate seat is the likely topic.

The pay-to-play scheme that cost former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich his job and landed him in federal prison is again threatening to entangle US Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D) of Illinois in its web of cronyism and political corruption.

Robert Blagojevich, the ex-governor's brother, is expected to talk this month to a congressional ethics committee about Representative Jackson, according to news reports. The information he will relay to the House Committee on Ethics has never been made public, the reports say. 

Blagojevich the brother has long maintained that “I have information I think will help them find the truth,” as he told the Chicago Sun-Times last fall. “Based on what I know, I believe Jesse Jackson Jr. has a lot of unanswered questions that he needs to answer.”

Questions have long swirled around Jackson and whether he sought to win appointment to the US Senate seat that became vacant after Barack Obama was elected president.

During the ex-governor's second trial on corruption charges, federal prosecutors said Jackson was involved in a potential $1 million deal by which he would win the governor's nod to fill the vacant Senate seat. Jackson denied any wrongdoing and has never been charged. Former Governor Blagojevich was convicted and sentenced to 14 years in prison. 

The US Office of Congressional Ethics investigated Jackson starting in 2009 to determine if he improperly lobbied Illinois' governor for the US Senate seat. In a late December report, the House Committee on Ethics said there was “probable cause” that Jackson was engaged in a pay-to-play scheme at a time when the governor was seeking campaign donations in exchange for an appointment to the seat. Robert Blagojevich's impending testimony may indicate the committee is resuming its examination of Jackson.

Witness testimony and a wiretap played during Rod Blagojevich's trial revealed that Jackson and the governor negotiated through two separate businessmen from the Indian-American community on Chicago's North Side. Rajinder Bedi, who worked for then-Governor Blagojevich, testified that he met with Jackson and Raghuveer Nayak, a Jackson supporter and fundraiser, in a downtown restaurant on Oct. 28, 2008. At that meeting, Mr. Bedi testified, Jackson expressed interest in the Senate seat, and the discussion turned to political fundraising.

Bedi said Mr. Nayak discussed the possibility of Jackson raising as much as $6 million to tilt the governor's Senate selection in Jackson's favor.

A wiretap recording from Oct. 31, 2008, showed Blagojevich’s surprise upon hearing from Bedi about Jackson’s overtures.

“Unbelievable isn’t it … we were approached, pay to play. That, you know, he’d raise me 500 grand, an emissary came, then the other guy would raise a million, if I made him a senator,” Blagojevich says.

Jackson denied having any role in a pay-to-play scheme. “My interest in the Senate seat was based on years of public service, which I am proud of, not some improper scheme with anyone,” he said in a statement released after Bedi's testimony.

Robert Blagojevich was originally indicted along with his brother, but the four charges against him were dropped after a jury deadlocked in the first trial. 

When Jackson testified in the second trial for the prosecution, he said Rod Blagojevich refused to appoint Jackson’s wife as the head of the Illinois Lottery because Jackson failed to deliver a $25,000 campaign contribution.

“In classic Elvis Presley fashion, he snapped his fingers and said, ‘You should have given me that $25,000,’ ” Jackson said. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.