Iwo Jima flag raising: Curious historians prompt Marine Corps investigation

AP photographer Joe Rosenthal didn't get the name of the flag raisers, leaving the task to the Marines, who, after some confusion, may have misidentified one of the men.

Joe Rosenthal/AP/File
The Marine Corps said Monday, that it has begun investigating whether it mistakenly identified one of the men shown raising the US flag at Iwo Jima in one of the iconic images of World War II, shown here, after two amateur history buffs began raising questions about the picture.

The Marine Corps has launched an inquiry into whether it misidentified one of the six men shown raising an American flag on the top of Mount Suribachi on Iwo Jima in February 1945, a year after historians raised doubts about the identity of the man.

The picture taken by Associated Press photographer Joe Rosenthal, has been accepted for decades, and remained as one of the quintessential snapshots of World War II.

However, in 2014, historians including Eric Krelle, of Omaha, Neb., and Stephen Foley, of Wexford, Ireland, began raising doubts about the picture. In November of the same year, the Omaha World-Herald published a report with their queries.

Mr. Foley picked up on the initial discrepancies and later enlisted the help of Mr. Krelle, who maintains a website dedicated to the Marines' 5th Division. A comparison of the photo with other images taken that day led the historians to speculate that the man identified as Bradley was actually Harold Henry Schultz, a private first class who died in 1995.

"The Marine Corps is examining information provided by a private organization related (to) Joe Rosenthal's Associated Press photograph of the second flag raising on Iwo Jima” said a Marine’s statement issued Monday

Mr. "Rosenthal's photo captured a single moment in the 36-day battle during which more than 6,500 US servicemen made the ultimate sacrifice for our Nation and it is representative of the more than 70,000 US Marines, Sailors, Soldiers and Coast Guardsmen that took part in the battle,” the statement continued. “We are humbled by the service and sacrifice of all who fought on Iwo Jima."

The battle of Iwo Jima began on Feb. 19, 1945, and went on for more than five weeks, as 70,000 marines and 18,000 Japanese soldiers fought for control of the tiny island, which was deemed essential to the United States as a landing site for American bombers. Nearly 7,000 US troops died in the battle, and another 20,000 were wounded.

Rosenthal snapped the photo on Feb 23, 1945, during second time the flag was raised that day. He could not identify the men immediately after, but the Marines later identified the men as five marines; Rene Gagnon, Ira Hayes, Harlon Block, Michael Strank, and Franklin Sousley, and a Navy corpsman identified as John Bradley. Block, Strank, and Sousley died in the battle, before the picture was distributed in the US.

Hal Buell, a retired AP executive news photo editor had discussed the famous picture with Rosenthal, and later wrote a book about it in 2006. Mr. Buell said that Rosenthal didn’t get a chance to ask the men their names, as they had been busy with other tasks.

Bradley's son, James Bradley, also wrote a best-selling book about the flag raisers, titled "Flags of Our Fathers," which was later made into a movie directed by Clint Eastwood.

"This is unbelievable," Mr. Bradley told the Associated Press, adding that he was shocked the Marines were investigating the identity of the men.

"I'm interested in facts and truths, so that's fine, but I don't know what's happening," he said.

This report contains materials from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.