Chinese jet buzzes US spy plane: Pattern of aggressiveness?

Last week, the Pentagon says a Chinese jet performed an 'unsafe' maneuver near a US aircraft. What does this say about China-US relations? 

(AP Photo/OSD)
This handout photo provided by the Office of the Defense Secretary (OSD), taken Aug. 19, 2014, shows a Chinese fighter jet that the Obama administration said Friday conducted a "dangerous intercept" of a U.S. Navy surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft off the coast of China in international airspace.

A Chinese aircraft performed an unsafe maneuver during an air intercept of a U.S. spy plane last week, reported the Pentagon on Tuesday, the same day Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived in Seattle.

The Department of Justice is now reviewing the report of the incident to determine if it was a deliberate move, though it doesn’t appear to have been provocative, reports Reuters.

Though allegedly unaware of the incident, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei told reporters, "China has consistently dedicated itself to maintaining maritime and air safety in accordance with international laws and norms, and to establishing mutual military trust with other countries to appropriately manage differences."

Though the intercept did not mirror the incident in August 2014 when a Chinese warplane barrel rolled over a US Navy patrol jet, Pentagon officials do suggest the incident shows China is continuing to assert its military reach.

“Yet another dangerous Chinese intercept of a U.S. aircraft last week shows that China feels emboldened to continue its pattern of aggressive behavior in the Asia-Pacific region,” Senator John McCain, chair of the Senate Armed Forces Committee, said in a statement on Tuesday.

“That this flight came amid negotiations of rules for air-to-air encounters and just one week ahead of President Xi's arrival in the United States raises further questions about China's intentions and the Obama administration’s response thus far," the statement continued.

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, President Xi insisted that China’s military action is “defensive in nature.”

"In strengthening our defense and military...we are not going after some kind of military adventure," Xi said. "It never crosses my mind."

But both countries have previously agitated the other in separate instances this year. Earlier this month, while President Obama visited Alaska, five Chinese Navy ships sailed just off the coast in the Bering Sea, reported The Washington Post.

And in May, “China’s navy issued warnings eight times as a US surveillance plane swooped over islands that Beijing has claimed over its neighbors' opposition,” reported CNN.

But as Xi told the Journal, “[China and the US] interests converge in a broad range of areas.”

“Together, China and the United States account for one-third of the world economy, one-fourth of the global population, and one-fifth of global trade,” he said. “If two big countries like ours do not cooperate with each other, just imagine what will happen to the world.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.