Top 10 revelations from Leon Panetta's new book 'Worthy Fights'

Former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta tackles some major policy debates in his new book, “Worthy Fights: a Memoir of Leadership in War and Peace,” out Tuesday. 

These include whether President Obama pushed hard enough to leave US troops in Iraq back in 2011 (Mr. Panetta doesn’t think so) to whether the White House tried to cover up the circumstances surrounding the death of a US ambassador in Benghazi, Libya. (No, but Panetta disagreed with the intelligence assessments of then-CIA director David Petraeus.)

Here are the top 10 revelations – some more surprising than others – from the book.

1. Osama bin Laden raid almost delayed for a social event

Pete Souza/The White House/AP/File
President Obama and members of the national security team watch an update on the mission against Osama bin Laden in the Situation Room of the White House in Washington on May 1, 2011.

Mr. Panetta, who was then head of the CIA, had warned his CIA colleagues and others that if the Special Forces raid on Osama bin Laden's compound were conducted on Saturday night, it would conflict with the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner, “a high-profile evening that brings together Washington journalists and political figures,” he notes. “It would be hard to explain the absence of the president and other key officials from the event.”

This warning “rankled some of the military leaders, who groused about having to accommodate the ‘Washington social schedule’ in a matter of national security.”

It was the head of Joint Special Operations Forces, Adm. William McRaven, who helped avoid a clash: He concluded that the weather was “slightly more advantageous” on Sunday than Saturday.

1 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.