Douglas McAuthur McCain: What was lure of Islamic State for him – and others?

Douglas McAuthur McCain, who was killed while battling rebel forces in a Syrian suburb, made it clear on social media that he found camaraderie and a sense of conviction in the Islamic State.

Hennepin County, Minn. Sheriff's Office/AP
Douglas McAuthur McCain is seen in this 2008 photo. On Tuesday, Aug. 26, 2014, a US official said McCain, a US citizen, is believed to have been killed in Syria and was there to fight alongside a terrorist group, most likely the Islamic State group.

Top US intelligence officials have been warning for years about the threat of “home-grown violent extremists,” or HVEs in their shorthand lingo.

These are typically young Americans, they say, who may feel like outcasts in their own communities but find comfort and purpose in a greater cause – such as, say, violent jihad – often through the Internet.

Minnesota resident Douglas McAuthur McCain, who was killed while battling rebel forces in a Syrian suburb, posted Facebook entries and tweets making it clear that he found camaraderie and a sense of conviction in the Islamic State, also known as IS or ISIS.

“I’m with brothers now,” he tweeted in June from Syria, according to NBC News. “It takes a warrior to understand a warrior. Pray for ISIS.”

Born in Illinois and raised in Minnesota’s Twin Cities area, Mr. McCain is “absolutely the next iteration of the home-grown terrorist threat,” says Matthew Levitt, director of the Washington Institute’s Stein Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.

“These home-grown violent extremists are people who keep me up at night,” Attorney General Eric Holder warned in July. “Trying to monitor them, trying to anticipate what it is they are going to do.”

In the case of McCain and others, they may “go over as disaffected young men and come back having forged networks and training – as well as battlefield experience,” says Michael Singh, former senior director for Middle East affairs at the National Security Council, who is now also at the Washington Institute.

An estimated 300 Americans have gone to fight – or attempted to go and fight – in the region, according US intelligence officials. In July, an American from Florida, Moner Mohammad Abusalha, carried out a suicide attack in Syria on behalf of Jabhat al-Nusra, which the United States has labeled a terrorist organization. 

With the war in Syria, “the foreign fighter phenomenon continues to grow,” says Dr. Levitt, who adds that the conflict has drawn far more foreign fighters than Kosovo, Bosnia, Iraq, or Afghanistan.

The process of recruiting foreign fighters – specifically, the ways in which IS reaches out to Americans – is also troubling to US intelligence officials.

“IS is the sexiest jihadi group on the block right now, and also the most prominent on social media,” Levitt says.

This in turn has helped the group reach out to Americans far more effectively. As a result, “Our concern is that the radicalization process has sped up so significantly: The timeline is so much shorter, and it’s much harder to identify them in time.”

Before Syria, potential recruits had to be radicalized to the point where they were willing to carry out violent jihad. “Now, with Syria, all you have to do is convince them to defend innocent Sunni women and children against the butcher [Syrian leader Bashar al] Assad, or to go help create the idyllic Islamic state,” Levitt says.

Recently, Levitt says, he met with European intelligence officials who “just had a bunch of 15-year-olds who went for a little jihadi spring break. The ease of travel is so significant in terms of going to Turkey and then south.”

From there, he adds, “They can get radicalized very quickly.”

More troubling, as they return to America, they may decide to carry out attacks “at the behest of others. Or, scarier still – because they don’t send e-mails, make phone calls, or trigger other electronic tripwires,” Levitt notes, “they decide to do things on their own.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.