Pentagon clarifies what could happen to Bowe Bergdahl if he went AWOL

The Pentagon has not yet begun its investigation into the circumstances that led to the capture of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. But the Pentagon explained what it will be looking into and how that could affect the sergeant.

Voice Of Jihad Website/AP
Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl sits in a vehicle guarded by the Taliban in eastern Afghanistan before he is handed over to US forces late last month.

If the US Army determines that Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl wandered off his small outpost in Afghanistan without authorization – in other words, if he was absent without leave – this will effectively negate his status as a “captured” soldier, the Pentagon said Wednesday.

Sergeant Bergdahl may be classified as captured, absent without leave (AWOL), or a deserter. “They are all mutually exclusive,” said a senior Army official, who briefed Pentagon reporters Wednesday on condition of anonymity.

While it is possible for a US soldier to be AWOL and also to be held against his will, “In a legal context, you’re going to be one or the other,” the official added.

It is a legal distinction with big implications for Bergdahl. If he is found to be AWOL or a deserter, for example, he may be forced to forfeit some $200,000 in accrued pay during his captivity.

Bergdahl has not been advised of his rights and he has not been appointed an attorney, the official said, adding that “he has not asked for an attorney.”

The Army soldier, who was held in captivity for five years, is in the “last stage” of his reintegration process.

The focus of the reintegration debriefings has been on the time he has been held in captivity – not the time leading up to his capture, says another senior Army official, who also briefed Pentagon reporters on condition of anonymity.

Bergdahl is not suspected of colluding with the enemy or acting against the Uniform Code of Military Justice while he was in captivity, one senior Army official said. It is the time leading up to his capture that will be the focus of an Army investigation.

If, however, Bergdahl makes a “spontaneous” confession during his reintegration treatment, this could potentially be used against him, the official adds. In that case, the reintegration would stop, and Bergdahl would be advised of his rights.

He has not yet made any admissions that could be used against him, one of the senior Army officials said.

If Bergdahl is determined to have been AWOL or to have deserted – desertion means he never intended to return, whereas AWOL means he just went away for a while – then he could be court-martialed, demoted, and forced to forfeit the back pay.

As it stands now, “There is some pay that is in contention because of his duty status,” said one of the senior Army officials, who added that this money is being kept in a separate military account until the investigation is completed.

“Pay is tied to duty status,” the official added. A soldier with the status of “missing/captured is entitled to that pay,” while soldiers who are determined to be AWOL are not.

“If Bergdahl is found to be AWOL, then all that time since he left the post five years ago is considered ‘bad time’ and is not creditable,” says a former US military judge advocate general, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to discuss the case.

The investigation into Bergdahl’s duty status will likely begin in “a couple of weeks,” officials said. At that point, Army investigators will have 60 days to complete their investigation.

In the meantime, one senior Army official added, “I can tell you that he’s been cooperative to date.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.