US general aims to ease China's concerns over Obama 'pivot' to Asia

China is deeply suspicious of US intent in its 'pivot' to Asia, and US Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is in Beijing this week to try to reassure China's military – and its people.

Andy Wong/AP
Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey (l.) and Chinese counterpart Gen. Fang Fenghui salute during a welcoming ceremony at the Bayi Building in Beijing, Monday.

Easing China's concerns over the Pentagon's strategic "pivot" to the Asia-Pacific is high on the agenda of Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, during his visit to Beijing this week for the highest-level military talks between the two superpowers in two years.

It is a concerted campaign to win hearts and minds, and in that regard, General Dempsey has much with which to contend. 

After a decade of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, the US military is wagering that a focus on the other side of the globe is a better use of its resources. Senior US defense officials insist that this move is in no way a reaction to China’s ascendant military might. 

China, on the other hand, sees it differently – namely, as a bit of an incursion on its turf.

A white paper released earlier this month by China’s People's Liberation Army warns ominously, if elliptically, that “some countries are strengthening their Asia-Pacific military alliances, expanding military presence in the region, and frequently making the situation there tenser.”

It is clear to Pentagon officials that “some countries” means the United States.

Indications this week are that Dempsey is making some headway in his quest to deepen military-to-military relations with his Chinese counterpart, which has long been a goal of US defense officials.

At a press conference, Dempsey’s counterpart, Gen. Fang Fenghui, allowed that “the Pacific Ocean is wide enough to accommodate us both” and that a couple of realistic goals for the two nations might include “to respect each other’s co-interest” in the region and to “avoid vicious competition, friction, or even confrontation in this area.”

Senior US military officials say they also made progress laying groundwork for more open communication between the two militaries and began developing “rules of behavior” meant to “prevent or minimize misunderstandings or accidents when US and Chinese military forces operate in proximity to one another.”

Tensions remain, however. “We all know about your rebalance strategy,” a Chinese reporter told Dempsey during Monday’s press conference. “We cannot help but notice the frequent joint military exercises in the vicinity of China.” 

Such concerns within China are “probably the core of why I made this visit,” Dempsey said.

But even as the United States endeavors to deepen its military ties with China, Dempsey pointedly stressed that it will do that only “in the context of some of our other historic and enduring alliances.” 

This was Dempsey’s own reference to the US relationship with Asia-Pacific allies such as Taiwan, a recipient of US arms that the US is committed to defend and that China claims as its own.

There will be points at which these historical US alliances cause “friction,” he added, “and we’ll have to review those.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.