Nazi flag incident puts culture of Marine snipers in spotlight

The photo of Marine snipers in Afghanistan posing in front of a Nazi flag has prompted the top Marine officer to start a review of sniper protocol and training. 

knightarmco.com/AP/File
Marines Nazi flag confusion? The Marine Corps confirmed Thursday, that one of its scout sniper teams in Afghanistan posed for a photograph in front of a flag with a logo resembling that of the notorious Nazi SS.

A top Pentagon officer is launching an investigation into the prevalence of Nazi symbols within the Marine Corps.

The nation’s highest ranking Marine officer, Gen. James Amos, also issued an apology “to all offended by this regrettable incident.” 

The “incident” was a photograph of 10 US Marine Corps snipers in Afghanistan, posing with a Nazi SS flag. The SS, or Schutzstaffel, was the notoriously murderous arm of the Nazi party

A Marine Corps spokesman said that the snipers in question were not aware of the significance of the flag, and thought that it stood for “sniper scouts.” 

The now widely circulated photograph comes on the heels of a video which captured Marine squad leader and others urinating on dead Taliban fighters. The Marine Corps says it is still investigating that incident.

The service also has drawn recent criticism for a trial of Marines who killed two dozen Iraqi civilians at Haditha, Iraq, in 2005. The head of the unit responsible for the killing was charged with dereliction of duty and sentence to serve 90 days in the brig – jail time which the Marine commander waived. 

Critics said the light sentence for the unit leader – and the decision to drop charges against others associated with the Haditha shooting – failed to convey the seriousness of the Marines’ actions.

General Amos says he was made aware of the photograph with the Nazi flag Thursday. The direct commanders responsible for the US troops posing in the photograph had concluded in a November inquiry that they “were ignorant of the connection of this symbol to the Holocaust and monumental atrocities associated with Nazi Germany,” Amos said in a statement released Friday.

Members of the SS pledged an oath of loyalty to Adolph Hitler and carried out many crimes – including torture and murder – against Jews, gypsies, and others during World War II.

On the heels of the incident, “a formal instructional class was prepared and delivered by unit leadership” in Afghanistan, Amos added.

Amid the furor caused by the photo, Amos announced some additional steps the Marine Corps would be taking as well. 

For starters, he ordered commanders to “investigate the prevalence or use of SS or other unauthorized symbols within the reconnaissance and sniper communities.”

Amos also directed the sergeant major of the Marine Corps – the service’s top noncommissioned officer – to “immediately detach from his current duties in Washington and personally meet with every senior staff noncommissioned officer and Marine from our sniper and reconnaissance communities to reinforce my message and expectations.”

Finally, Amos said that he had asked the general in charge of the Marine Corps training and education command to “review the current sniper school curriculum to ensure it contains prohibitions on the use of the SS symbol and other inappropriate symbols.”

Pentagon press secretary George Little weighed in on the photograph on Friday, as well.

“Racist and anti-Semitic symbols have absolutely no place alongside the men and women of America’s armed forces. [Defense] Secretary [Leon] Panetta has asked the Marine Corps to look into this matter and to take appropriate action,” he said in a statement.

Added Amos, “I want to be clear that the Marine Corps unequivocally does not condone the use of any such symbols to represent our units or Marines.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.