US court to hear arguments on gay marriage bans in three southern states

Proponents of the bans in Texas, Louisiana and Alabama have argued that states have the right to decide who can marry and that it is in the states' interests to promote marriage between a man and a woman.

Eric Gay/AP/File
In this Feb. 12, 2014 file photo, Mark Phariss, left, holds the hand of his same-sex partner Victor Holmes, right, as they talk to the media outside the U.S. Federal Courthouse in San Antonio. Two signature Texas laws signed by outgoing Republican Gov. Rick Perry are on potentially shaky ground Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2015, when the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans considers whether the state can continue banning same-sex marriage and impose rigid standards on abortion providers.

A US federal appeals court is set on Friday to weigh whether to strike down same-sex marriage bans in the conservative southern states of Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi.

A three-judge panel will hear arguments about gay marriage bans in the three states, setting up a possible decision that could allow gay marriages to go ahead.

The hearings before the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit come as momentum builds nationwide to allow same-sex marriage, which is now legal in 36 states.

Also on Friday, US Supreme Court justices will meet in private to decide whether to add cases on the issue to their calendar this term.

The suit in Texas, which is the most populous state where gay marriage remains illegal, was filed on behalf of Austin residents Cleopatra De Leon and Nicole Dimetman, who were married in Massachusetts, and Victor Holmes and Mark Phariss, who were denied a marriage license when they applied in Texas.

In February, US District Judge Orlando Garcia ruled the Texas ban unconstitutional because it denied the couples equal protection under the law. Enforcement of the decision is on hold pending the appeal.

Proponents of the bans in Texas, Louisiana and Alabama have argued that states have the right to decide who can marry and that it is in the states' interests to promote marriage between a man and a woman.

In September, a US district judge upheld Louisiana's gay marriage ban, in what was a break from a string of recent rulings against such bans in other states that followed a US Supreme Court decision in June 2013 expanding federal recognition of same-sex marriages.

Two months later, a US district judge struck down as unconstitutional a same-sex marriage ban in Mississippi, overturning a measure that voters overwhelmingly approved about a decade ago.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.