Oregon wildfires controlled, but Colorado wildfires only 45 percent contained

Oregon wildfires have been stemmed by better weather and more fire crews, but the Colorado wildfires are still raging. The Colorado wildfires already have destroyed nearly 500 homes.

Mark Leffingwell / Reuters
El Paso County Sheriff Terry Maketa gives a containment update on the Black Forest Fire near Colorado Springs, Colorado, on June 15. Rain and calmer winds helped firefighters tame Colorado's most destructive wildfire on record. Fire managers expect it will take nearly another week to fully corral the blaze, but rain showers and a successful night on the fire lines mark a 'turning point,' says Maketa.

Wildfire update: Oregon's wildfires have slowed, thanks to better weather and more firefighters, while Colorado firefighters "are getting the upper hand" on the most destructive wildfire in state history.

Colorado officials are beginning to see the grim landscape the wildfire has left behind, says El Paso County Sheriff Terry Maketa.

In some areas, it looks "like a nuclear bomb went off," said Sherrif Maketa, making it difficult for officials know what used to be homes or other structures.

The fire that exploded Tuesday outside of Colorado Springs has destroyed nearly 500 homes and killed 2 people. 

In Oregon, crews have a handle on the Malheur County fires that were caused by lightning and driven by two days of windy weather, said Mark Wilkening, a spokesman for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, on Thursday. He gave credit to the arrival of more firefighters and equipment on Wednesday, shifting and calming winds, and spotty rain.

In Oregon, containment lines have been drawn around more than 60 percent of the fire area.

In Colorado, containment is at 45 percent, and most mandatory evacuation orders have been lifted.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.