Head of nuclear security agency steps down

On Friday, Tom D'Agostino announced his resignation from the National Nuclear Security Administration. His departure comes while the agency is under scrutiny for installing an inoperable multimillion-dollar security system at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Los Alamos National Laboratory/AP/File
The Los Alamos National Laboratory nuclear facility in New Mexico in 1995. On Friday, Tom D'Agostino, head of the national nuclear security agency, which oversees the lab, announced his resignation. A $213 million security system at Los Alamos that doesn't work has been a black eye for the lab and the agency.

The man who has led the US nuclear security agency since 2007 is stepping down next month after presiding over a 20 percent increase in the agency's budget but also some management missteps that have raised questions about the agency's ability to carry out its mission.

Tom D'Agostino announced Friday he is leaving the National Nuclear Security Administration, which funds and oversees work at the Sandia and Los Alamos national labs in New Mexico. The research centers employ about 20,000 people in the state. He was appointed to the post by President George W. Bush.

Mr. D'Agostino issued a statement saying he wants to spend more time with family and says periodic leadership changes make organizations healthier, the Albuquerque Journal reported.

His announcement came the same day the agency ordered security stepped-up at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Lab spokesman Kevin Roark declined to say why security was increased or if it had anything to do with a new but inoperable $213 million security system around the lab's most sensitive nuclear facilities. The system was supposed to be up and running this summer, but officials now say it will take an additional $41 million and another six months to fix.

Mr. Roark said lab officials never discuss the reasons behind security alerts, but he noted Friday's order was exclusive to Los Alamos.

In addition to the national labs, the National Nuclear Security Administration oversees the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile, works on nuclear proliferation issues, oversees nuclear reactors on naval ships, and plans for nuclear emergencies. Sites it runs also include the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge, Tenn., where a security breach earlier this year by three antinuclear protesters and a scandal involving private guards getting copies of security skills test questions led to questions about the NNSA's oversight of private contractors.

Last month, five security workers at Los Alamos were fired for taking unauthorized visitors to a shooting range on the lab's campus.

D'Agostino came to the NNSA after a career in the Navy, serving aboard the USS Skipjack, a nuclear-powered attack submarine. He was deputy director of the NNSA, overseeing much of its nuclear weapons work, beginning in 2006, and took over the agency's top job in August 2007. In September 2009, the Obama administration asked D'Agostino to stay in the post, making him one of a handful of top government officials to keep their politically appointed jobs after the last change in administrations.

"This was a difficult decision for me as I am committed to serving our country, committed to the missions of the NNSA, the Environmental Management Organization, the Office of Legacy Management, and I am committed to you in carrying out this mission," D'Agostino said in the statement. "However, I have an equally important commitment to my wife and family, and I am a strong believer that organizations are healthier when leadership changes on a periodic basis."

Energy Secretary Steven Chu issued a statement praising his service.

"From the reactor room on the USS Skipjack to the Roosevelt Room at the White House, Tom D'Agostino has proven himself to be a talented leader, a trusted adviser and a true confidant," Chu said.

D'Agostino will step down Jan. 18, and Neile Miller, his top deputy, will assume acting NNSA director's responsibility.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Head of nuclear security agency steps down
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today