Mark Strong, Zumba sex case co-defendant, says he broke no laws

Mark Strong has pleaded not guilty to 59 misdemeanor counts including promoting prostitution and violating the privacy of men who were allegedly videotaped without their knowledge.

Joel Page/AP/File
In this Oct. 9 photo, Mark Strong Sr., right, sits with his attorney Dan Lilley, during his arraignment in Portland, Maine on 59 charges, including promotion of prostitution and violation of privacy in connection with a Kennebunk Zumba dance studio.

An insurance agent who helped a dance instructor launch a Zumba studio that police say was a front for prostitution contends he used bad judgment but committed no crimes.

Mark Strong Sr. of Thomaston issued a statement through his attorney that said he had a personal relationship with Alexis Wright but never paid for sex. He said he co-signed for her lease and loaned the business money that was repaid with interest.

Strong has pleaded not guilty to 59 misdemeanor counts including promoting prostitution and violating the privacy of men who were allegedly videotaped without their knowledge.

"The charges against me are untrue," he said Wednesday in the written statement. "I have made some bad choices but have broken no laws."

Wright, from nearby Wells, has pleaded not guilty to 106 counts of prostitution, invasion of privacy and other charges. Police say Wright kept "meticulous" records and a client list that lawyers involved in the case said includes more than 150 names, including those of prominent figures.

The first 21 names to be released included a former mayor in southern Maine and a high school ice hockey coach who opted not to renew his contract.

Strong said law enforcement officials originally charged him with promoting prostitution and arrested him in July as retaliation because he was looking into possible harassment of Wright by the Kennebunk police department.

The police department said there was no harassment of either Strong or of Wright. Both were investigated because there was probable cause that criminal activity took place at the dance studio, said Lt. Anthony Bean Burpee.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.