Romney accuses Obama of pandering on immigration

The GOP candidate says his opponent is just playing politics with his recent policy shift. 

Evan Vucci/AP
Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, gestures during a campaign stop at Monterey Mills on Monday, June 18, in Janesville, Wis.

Mitt Romney introduced criticism of President Barack Obama’s record on illegal immigration into his standard campaign speech on Monday as he wrapped up a swing across eastern Iowa.

Romney had avoided bringing up the topic in remarks to supporters at the eight other rallies he has held since Obama announced Friday that the administration would not deport many young illegal immigrants who came to the United States as children.

At the Davenport rally, Romney led up to the immigration attack by accusing Obama of neglecting the economy and the deficit while going to work on health care, organized labor’s effort to expand its ranks and the banking overhaul known as Dodd-Frank.

RECOMMENDED: Obama immigration order: Does 'audacity of hope' mean unchecked presidential power?

“He went after all the things that he and his liberal friends had been trying to do for years,” Romney told a few hundred flag-waving supporters here at a Mississippi River waterfront bandshell rally, where his campaign was shooting TV commercials.

“He was going to deal with immigration, he said, in his first year,” Romney added. “He was going to focus on that. Did he do anything on immigration while he had a Democratic House and Senate?”

“No,” the crowd shouted.

“No,” Romney continued. “This is a president who’s said one thing and done another. “

In a Fox News interview, Romney dodged the question of whether he would reverse Obama’s deportation policy, just as he did in an interview Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

Romney said he did not want to play political football with “those people who come here by virtue of their parents bringing them here, who came in illegally.”

Romney’s remarks at the rally were significant, because he has otherwise focused intensely on the economy on the first four days of a small-town America tour that concludes Tuesday in Michigan.

The timing of Obama’s announcement on Friday — just as Romney was beginning his tour in Stratham, N.H. — forced Romney to address the issue in comments to reporters, shifting the focus of campaign news from the economy to immigration.

But Romney has otherwise avoided raising the topic as he has sought to win local news coverage of his speeches hammering Obama on the economy.

Illegal immigration has posed a tough challenge for Romney. In the Republican primaries, he struck a hard line to appeal to conservatives at the risk of turning off Latinos in the general election. Lately, he has moderated his tone as he struggles to narrow Obama’s advantage among Latinos, but risks alienating conservatives if he goes too far.

RECOMMENDED: Obama immigration order: Does 'audacity of hope' mean unchecked presidential power?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.