Roger Clemens jurors ask for exhibits list as deliberations continue

The jury only deliberated for a half-day today on the former pitcher's perjury trial; they will return Monday because the judge is out of town the rest of the week.

Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
Roger Clemens leaves federal court in Washington, DC on Tuesday, June 12; his perjury case is now in the jury's hands.

Jurors asked for a master list of exhibits — a list that extends well into triple digits — and lawyers laughed about a juror who appeared to doze off during closing arguments as deliberations continued Wednesday in the perjury trial of Roger Clemens.

The eight women and four men met for about 3 ½ hours in the afternoon, an abbreviated day because one of them had a scheduling conflict. They then recessed until Monday, taking a four-day break while U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton travels to New Orleans for a speaking engagement — a trip that didn't appear to be an issue when the trial began April 16.

While the jury caucused in a separate room, the judge summoned the lawyers to his courtroom for a brief hearing to address several juror-related issues, including the request for the list of exhibits. Clemens lawyer Rusty Hardin said the defense had its list handy, but prosecutor Steven Durham said the government would need about an hour to produce its list because some items were not introduced during the trial.

RELATED: How well do you know Roger Clemens? A quiz

It was yet another indication of the scope of the proceedings, and why a quick verdict seemed unlikely. The exhibits — which include documents, video and audio excerpts, photographs and various pieces of physical evidence — used up numbers that ran well past 100 and nearly every letter of the alphabet. The various medical waste saved in a FedEx box by Clemens' chief accuser Brian McNamee went from 52A to 52X.

Clemens is charged with perjury, making false statements and obstructing Congress. The charges center on his assertion — made at both a hearing and a sworn deposition in 2008 — that he never used steroids and human growth hormone during his stellar baseball career. The obstruction count includes 13 alleged untruths, part of a complex verdict sheet given to the jurors when they held their first 15 minutes of deliberations late Tuesday afternoon.

Two jurors were dismissed for sleeping during the trial, and the judge said Wednesday that Hardin noticed another juror appeared to drift off during the lawyer's closing argument the day before. The judge said that's why Hardin pounded the podium multiple times.

Lawyers had previously raised concerns about the woman's attentiveness during the trial.

"My impression is that she puts her head down — it's hard to see if her eyes are closed or not," Walton said. "Maybe she listens by closing her eyes."

Neither side raised any objections to keeping the woman on the jury. A laughing Hardin said that the juror "hurt my feelings" by staying awake during the prosecutor's closing. Durham said he was "just grateful that Mr. Hardin didn't break the podium." Walton then quipped there was no money to fix it. While many in the courtroom laughed, Clemens sat expressionless at the defense table.

The court is running out of juror options anyway. There is only one alternate remaining — down from four at the start of the trial — and he is scheduled to leave for a six-month trip to Germany next week.

RELATED: How well do you know Roger Clemens? A quiz

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.