John Edwards trial: Day 7 for jury deliberations

The eight men and four women are expected to go back to work Tuesday as they consider campaign finance charges against the former presidential candidate.

Gerry Broome/AP
Former U.S. presidential candidate and Sen. John Edwards arrives at a federal court for the sixth day of jury deliberations in Greensboro, N.C., Friday, May 25.

A jury in North Carolina was to reconvene Tuesday for a seventh day of deliberations about whether former U.S. Senator John Edwards broke federal campaign finance laws as he tried to conceal an affair while running for president in 2008.

Jurors took a three-day break in Greensboro for the Memorial Day holiday weekend. U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles told them not to read or talk about the case while they were away.

Eagles held a private meeting about an undisclosed "juror issue" at the end of Friday's court session with Edwards and both sides of attorneys. The judge said she may need to discuss the matter with the parties again on Tuesday morning.

Edwards, 58, is accused of seeking more than $900,000 from heiress Rachel "Bunny" Mellon and trial lawyer Fred Baron to keep voters from learning he was cheating on his cancer-stricken wife, Elizabeth, as he sought the Democratic presidential nomination four years ago.

The defense says the payments were intended as personal gifts, not campaign contributions, to shield Elizabeth Edwards from her husband's affair with Rielle Hunter and Hunter's pregnancy with his child. Elizabeth Edwards died in 2010.

John Edwards, the Democrats' 2004 vice presidential nominee, faces possible prison time and fines if convicted of any of six felony counts stemming from the payments.

The charges include conspiring to solicit the money, receiving more than the $2,300 allowed from any one donor, and failing to report the payments as contributions.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.