White House may reject oil pipeline, Feb. deadline 'purely political'

White House spokesman Jay Carney stopped short of saying a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline had been made.

|
Joshua Roberts/Reuters/File
Demonstrators carry a giant mock pipeline while calling for the cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline during a rally in Washington in this Nov. 6, 2011 photo.

The White House tried to make its case Wednesday for rejecting a Canadian company's plan to build an oil pipeline from Canada to Texas, saying a February deadline set by Congress was "purely political" and did not allow for a proper review of the project.

White House spokesman Jay Carney stopped short of saying a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline had been made. But amid a flurry of reports that President Barack Obama would reject the project, Carney suggested an announcement could be imminent.

"I'm not going to get ahead of the administration or the secretary of state or the president," Carney said. "We may have more information for you later in the day."

Under a Republican-written provision Obama signed into law just before Christmas as part of a tax bill, the president faces a Feb. 21 deadline to decide whether the pipeline is in the national interest. The State Department has said that deadline doesn't leave it enough time for necessary reviews and Carney also took that stand.

"Imposing an arbitrary 60-day deadline on this process would make it virtually impossible for an adequate review to take place," he said.

Administration officials say that looming deadline has cut short the time needed to conduct required environmental reviews after the State Department ordered the project developer, TransCanada, to find an alternate route that avoids environmentally sensitive areas of Nebraska.

TransCanada says the project could create as many as 20,000 jobs over two years; opponents say that figure is inflated. A State Department report last summer said the pipeline would create up to 6,000 jobs during construction.

The GOP has pounded Obama over the issue, saying it's a question of whether he wants to create jobs and import energy from an ally, or lose jobs and see Canadian oil go to Asia instead.

The $7 billion pipeline would run through six states and carry oil from Canada to Texas Gulf Coast refineries.

The pipeline proposal has forced the White House to make a politically risky choice between two important Democratic constituencies. Many unions back the project because of the prospects of new jobs in a down economy. Environmental groups fear the pipeline could lead to an oil spill disaster.

Some liberal donors threatened to cut off funds to Obama's re-election campaign to protest the project, which opponents say would transport "dirty oil" that requires huge amounts of energy to extract.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to White House may reject oil pipeline, Feb. deadline 'purely political'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0118/White-House-may-reject-oil-pipeline-Feb.-deadline-purely-political
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe