Court to lift all restrictions on John Hinckley, Reagan shooter

On Monday, a federal judge ruled that John Hinckley Jr., the man who attempted to kill President Ronald Reagan in 1981 but was found not guilty due to insanity, will be freed from all court-imposed restrictions by next year should his mental health remain stable.

Evan Vucci/AP/File
John Hinckley Jr. arrives at the U.S. District Court in Washington, Nov. 18, 2003. A 2020 violence risk assessment showed that Mr. Hinckley, who lived with his mother until her passing in July 2021, would not pose a danger if he was released from all restrictions.

A federal judge said Monday that John Hinckley Jr., who tried to assassinate President Ronald Reagan four decades ago, can be freed from all remaining restrictions next year if he continues to follow those rules and remains mentally stable.

U.S. District Court Judge Paul L. Friedman in Washington said during a 90-minute court hearing that he’ll issue his ruling on the plan this week.

Since Mr. Hinckley moved to Williamsburg, Virginia, from a Washington hospital in 2016, court-imposed restrictions have required doctors and therapists to oversee his psychiatric medication and therapy. Mr. Hinckley has been barred from having a gun. And he can’t contact Reagan’s children, other victims, or their families, or actress Jodie Foster, whom he was obsessed with at the time of the 1981 shooting.

Mr. Friedman said Mr. Hinckley, now 66, has displayed no symptoms of active mental illness, no violent behavior, and no interest in weapons since 1983.

“If he hadn’t tried to kill the president, he would have been unconditionally released a long, long, long time ago,” the judge said. “But everybody is comfortable now after all of the studies, all of the analysis and all of the interviews and all of the experience with Mr. Hinckley.”

Mr. Friedman said the plan is to release Mr. Hinckley from all court supervision in June.

A 2020 violence risk assessment conducted on behalf of Washington’s Department of Behavioral Health concluded that Mr. Hinckley would not pose a danger if he’s unconditionally released.

The U.S. government had previously opposed ending restrictions. But it recently retained an independent expert to examine Mr. Hinckley and took a different position Monday, with attorneys saying they would agree to unconditional release if Mr. Hinckley follows the rules and shows mental stability for the next nine months.

Kacie Weston, an attorney for the U.S. government, said it wants to make sure Mr. Hinckley can adapt to living on his own for the first time in 40 years.

He recently moved out of his mother’s house, which sits along a golf course in a gated community in Williamsburg. She died in July. Attorneys did not say where Mr. Hinckley is currently living.

“Mr. Hinckley does have a history of turning inward, and toward isolation,” Ms. Weston said.

Another concern is the impending retirement of one of Mr. Hinckley’s therapists and the looming end to a therapy group, which has provided much support and social interaction. Ms. Weston said Mr. Hinckley will likely face challenges finding a similar group in the future.

“All we have to do is wait a few more months and see,” Ms. Weston said. “And we’ll have actual hard data. We’ll have information in real time to see how Mr. Hinckley adapts.”

Mr. Hinckley was 25 when he shot and wounded the 40th U.S. president outside a Washington hotel. The shooting paralyzed Reagan’s press secretary James Brady, who died in 2014. It also injured Secret Service agent Timothy McCarthy and Washington police officer Thomas Delahanty.

Mr. Hinckley did not attend Monday’s hearing. But Barry Levine, his attorney, said Mr. Hinckley wanted to express his “heartfelt” apologies and “profound regret” to the people he shot and their families as well as to Ms. Foster and the American people.

“Perhaps it is too much to ask for forgiveness,” Mr. Levine said. “But we hope they have an understanding that the acts that caused him to do this terrible thing [were caused by] mental illness.”

Mr. Hinckley was suffering from acute psychosis. When jurors found him not guilty by reason of insanity, they said he needed treatment and not a lifetime in confinement.

Such an acquittal meant that Mr. Hinckley could not be blamed or punished for what he did, legal experts have said. Mr. Hinckley was ordered to live at St. Elizabeths Hospital in Washington.

In the 2000s, Mr. Hinckley began making visits to his parents’ home in Williamsburg. A 2016 court order granted him permission to live with his mom full time after experts said his mental illness had been in remission for decades.

Mr. Friedman, the judge, has loosened some of Mr. Hinckley’s restrictions over the years. For instance, Mr. Hinckley was granted the right to publicly display his artwork and allowed to move out of his mother’s house. But he’s still barred from traveling to places where he knows there will be someone protected by the Secret Service.

Mr. Hinckley must give three days’ notice if he wants to travel more than 75 miles from home. He also has to turn over passwords for computers, phones, and online accounts such as email.

In recent years, Mr. Hinckley has sold items from a booth at an antique mall that he’s found at estate sales, flea markets, and consignment shops. He’s also shared his music on YouTube.

“I would hope that people will see this as a victory for mental health,” Mr. Levine, Mr. Hinckley’s attorney, said Monday. “That is the real message in this case – that people who have been ravaged by mental disease, with good support and access to treatment, can actually become productive members of society.”

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.