Immigrants sue White House over end to protected status program

Nine immigrants and five children filed a lawsuit Monday alleging that the Trump administration's decision to end a federal program giving immigrants temporary protected status is rooted in xenophobia.

Jeff Chiu/AP
Angela Henriques (second from l.) hugs her children and listens to the announcement of a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its decision to end protections for immigrants from El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan on March 12 in San Francisco.

The Trump administration's decision to end a program that lets immigrants from four countries live and work legally in the United States was motivated by racism and leaves the immigrants' American-born children with an "impossible choice," according to a federal lawsuit filed on Monday.

Nine immigrants and five children filed the suit in federal court in San Francisco to reinstate temporary protected status for people from El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan.

The status is granted to countries ravaged by natural disasters or war. It lets citizens of those countries remain in the US until the situation improves back home.

The lawsuit – at least the third challenging the administration's decision to end temporary protected status – cites President Trump's vulgar language during a meeting in January to describe African countries.

"They did it because of xenophobia, and we need to make sure that we say it loudly so that everyone knows," said Martha Arevalo, executive director of the immigrant advocacy group, Central American Resource Center.

Ms. Arevalo spoke at a rally to announce the lawsuit outside the federal courthouse in San Francisco that was attended by some of the plaintiffs and dozens of demonstrators, some carrying signs that read, "Let Our People Stay."

One of the plaintiffs, Cristina Morales, said she came to the US in 1993 at the age of 12 after fleeing El Salvador to escape domestic violence. She received temporary protected status in 2001 and now works as an after-school teacher in the San Francisco Bay Area.

She was accompanied at the rally by her daughter, Crista Ramos, who along with her son, Diego Ramos, are US citizens.

"I don't want the government to split my family and to lose my home, my friends, and the opportunity for a good education," Crista said.

Ms. Morales, her voice quivering with emotion, said she has nothing to go back to in El Salvador.

"If I pay taxes, health insurance, my house, and the education of my children, what I have done wrong," she said.

The lawsuit names the US Department of Homeland Security as a defendant. The department declined to comment on pending litigation.

More than 200,000 immigrants could face deportation because of the change in policy, and they have more than 200,000 American children who risk being uprooted from their communities and schools, according to plaintiffs in the case filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California and other immigrant advocates.

The children face the "impossible choice" of leaving their country with their parents or staying without them, according to the suit.

"These American children should not have to choose between their country and their family," Ahilan Arulanantham, advocacy and legal director of the ACLU of Southern California, said in a statement.

It's the latest lawsuit filed against the Trump administration over its crackdown on immigration. A case filed last month by Haitian and Salvadoran immigrants in Massachusetts also alleges the decision to end temporary protected status was racially motivated. The NAACP has filed a separate lawsuit in Maryland on behalf of Haitian immigrants who received temporary protected status.

The program was created for humanitarian reasons, and the status can be renewed by the US government following an evaluation.

El Salvador was designated for the program in 2001 after an earthquake and the country's status was repeatedly renewed. The Trump administration announced in January that the program would expire for El Salvador in September 2019.

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen concluded that El Salvador had received significant international aid to recover from the earthquake, and homes, schools, and hospitals there had been rebuilt.

The Trump administration has ended the program for the other three countries as well.

The lawsuit in California alleges that the US narrowed its criteria for determining whether countries qualified for temporary protected status and is violating the constitutional rights of people with temporary protected status and their US citizen children.

The lawsuit seeks a court order to reinstate temporary protected status for people from the four countries, but it also proposes an alternative that would protect recipients with school-aged US citizen children for as long as the children remain between five and 18 years old.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Immigrants sue White House over end to protected status program
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2018/0313/Immigrants-sue-White-House-over-end-to-protected-status-program
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe