DreamHost ordered to release Trump protest website data

DreamHost, an internet hosting company, has been ordered to turn over data records on a website used for organizing an anti-Trump protest during the president's inauguration. 

John Minchillo/AP/FIle
Police release pepper spray at protestors during a protest in downtown Washington after the inauguration of President Trump on Jan. 20, 2017. A District of Columbia Superior Court ruled, Aug. 24, that an internet hosting company must turn over records for a website that the government alleges was used to plan violent protests on the day of Mr. Trump’s inauguration.

A court ruled on Thursday that an internet hosting company must turn over records for a website that the government alleges was used to plan violent protests on the day of President Trump's inauguration.

Defense lawyers warned that the ruling by the District of Columbia Superior Court could have a chilling effect on electronic political activism and freedom of expression. 

Judge Robert Morin ordered DreamHost to provide the Justice Department with records for a website called disruptj20.org from October 2016, when the site debuted, to January 2017. 

Prosecutors allege the site was used to organize anti-Trump protests on Jan. 20, when more than 200 people were arrested after protesters broke windows and set fire to a limousine. 

Government lawyers originally obtained a search warrant for the site's records last month. But DreamHost challenged the request as overly broad and infringing on the rights of free speech and political expression for the site's approximately 1.3 million visitors. 

In response to those concerns, the Justice Department presented a scaled-down request to the court earlier this week, specifying that it was only seeking evidence of violent or criminal activity being planned for the inauguration. 

Lawyers for DreamHost argued that turning over the records would give the government access to names of thousands of Trump opponents who simply visited the site or participated in the protests in a peaceful way. They argued that those people wouldn't want their names in the hands of a government they oppose.

"The case is not about protecting the information once it's been turned over. It's about preventing the information from being turned over in the first place," said Chris Ghazarian, general counsel for DreamHost.

In their modified request for information, prosecutors stressed they were targeting only those who used the site to plot violence and not political dissidents who may have casually visited it. They said any information produced by the company that falls outside the scope of the warrant would be set aside, placed under seal and made unavailable to the government without a further court order.

Judge Morin, in approving the government's request, specified that the government's process of sifting and vetting the raw information would be closely monitored and he would personally supervise what he called the "minimization program" to ensure that information outside the scope of the government's request was protected and sealed. 

DreamHost's representatives said those court-ordered safeguards probably wouldn't assuage the fears of those who visited the website who don't trust the government's intentions or legal restrictions.

"The government will be in possession of this information and the government will be sifting through this information. That right there is problematic," said Raymond Aghaian, one of the lawyers representing the company. "That in DreamHost's view has a chilling effect on political expression."

This story was reported by The Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to DreamHost ordered to release Trump protest website data
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today