Alex Brandon/AP/File
A ticket from a showing of "The Dark Knight Rises" in Aurora, Colorado, where 12 were killed and more than 50 wounded in a mass shooting in 2012.

Cinemark drops bid to recoup $700,000 in litigation costs from Aurora victims

Cinemark, having successfully fought a lawsuit brought on by victims of the 2012 Colorado theater shooting, will not pursue incurred legal costs.

Despite losing a lawsuit against Cinemark USA, victims of a 2012 Colorado theater shooting will not have to pay the company’s $700,000 legal costs, after the company reached an agreement on Tuesday. 

Twelve people were killed and more than 70 were injured in a mass shooting at the Aurora Century 16 movie theater on July 20, 2012. Surviving victims and relatives of those killed later sued Cinemark, the company that owns the theater, arguing that it used insufficient security measures and that the attack might otherwise have been prevented. 

In the subsequent trial, Cinemark lawyers successfully argued that the incident was unforeseeable. In May, a jury found that the company was not liable for the shooting.

Under Colorado law, defendants of civil lawsuits are entitled to recoup "litigation costs," which are separate from attorney's fees, if they win in court. Cinemark spent nearly $700,000 defending itself in court, the chain said, and initially asked that the families who filed the suit pay that cost. 

But the company offered to withdraw its request if the victims agreed not to appeal the jury’s verdict. On Tuesday, both parties signed a stipulated agreement in Arapahoe District Court.

Cinemark's "goal has always been to resolve this matter fully and completely without an award of costs of any kind to any party," the company's lawyers wrote in the agreement.

As a formality, the deal must be signed by a judge before the case is officially closed. If approved, the suit would be the last of several state court claims against Cinemark in the wake of the attack.

A different group of victims had filed a federal lawsuit against the company, but that suit was dismissed following the state court’s verdict. Appeals have not yet been resolved in that case.

In the wake of the Aurora shooting, many uninsured victims were burdened by enormous medical bills. Several of the hospitals treating victims agreed to limit or waive those costs – a gesture echoed by Orlando hospitals after the Pulse nightclub shooting. In 2011, one year before the Colorado shooting, almost one third of the state's residents lacked health insurance, as the Associated Press reported in July 2012. 

"We are committed to supporting these families as they heal," Children's Hospital Colorado, which treated six victims, said in a statement at the time, announcing that it would cover uninsured victims' costs with donations and a charity care fund. 

In the criminal case following the shooting, prosecutors sought the death penalty for gunman James Holmes. Mr. Holmes pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, and in 2015, was convicted on 24 counts of murder and 140 counts of attempted murder. He was sentenced to multiple life sentences without the possibility of parole.

This report includes material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Cinemark drops bid to recoup $700,000 in litigation costs from Aurora victims
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today