Amid record violence, Chicago's Rahm Emanuel to hire more police officers

Chicago has historically had a high per capita rate of police officers, but after the deadliest month in 20 years, city officials are asking if more might still be needed.

Ashlee Rezin/Chicago Sun-Times/AP
Diann Aldridge hugs her grandchildren, Summer, (l.), 12, Sincere (r.), 10, and Shavae (c.), 8, during a vigil for their mother, Nykea Aldridge, at the Willie Mae Morris Empowerment Center, Sunday afternoon, in Chicago. Ms. Aldridge, a mother of four, and the cousin of NBA star Dwyane Wade, was pushing her baby in a stroller near a school where she'd planned to register her children when she was shot in the head and arm.

Chicago is in the midst of a wave of violence unseen for years, if not decades, and opinions are varied as to how to tackle it. Central to the debate is the city’s police force.

Up until this point, in an effort to address the spiraling crime, the answer has largely been to call upon police officers to work deep stretches of overtime, an approach that has both proponents and critics. Now, according to the Chicago Sun-Times, Rahm Emanuel, the city’s mayor, is choosing a different tack – hiring hundreds of new officers.

“It’s less of a change in strategy and more of a response to this incredible streak of gun violence,” the mayor’s city council floor leader, Pat O’Connor, told the Times. “By doing this, we hope to begin to get control of the gun violence that seems to grow all the time.”

The month of August saw 90 homicides in Chicago, more than the city has seen in any month since August 1996. A total of 472 people were victims of shootings, an average of more than 15 people each day.

The murders are blamed largely on gang violence, and, in an effort to rein in the crime, the city spent a record sum of $116.1 million on police overtime. This reflected a strategy to address the increasing shortfall in officer numbers as retirements outpaced new hires.

Supporters of the approach underscore the financial savings, pointing out that by having the same number of officers simply working more hours, there are no additional costs of pensions and benefits that would need to be found for new recruits. Moreover, for many officers, the additional income is welcome.

Yet there is a balance to be found, as many observers acknowledge: Too much overtime can lead to officer burnout and an increasingly unbalanced and unhealthy lifestyle, which serves neither the officers themselves nor those they serve.

The next question to decide is how many extra officers Chicago needs. According to the Chicago Justice Project, a nonprofit that promotes evidence-based reforms, the city has consistently had the highest number of officers per capita, alongside New York, when compared with some of the nation’s biggest metropolitan areas, including Houston, Phoenix, and Los Angeles.

Yet its homicide figures have also been the highest, highlighting the fact that a multitude of factors needs to be considered when determining the right number of officers for a given city.

When Mayor Rahm Emanuel of Chicago came to office, he promised to hire 1,000 extra officers, a pledge that has since been amended and adapted to save money. Ald. Ray Lopez, who represents part of Chicago's South Side – one of the areas suffering most from the surge in violence – says it is time for that original promise to be fulfilled.

"We have to decide if having our streets fully protected, if having our streets be places where children can come out without getting a bullet in their stomach just by sitting on the porch is worth paying for," Alderman Lopez told the Times.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.