Why brother of San Bernardino shooter is facing federal charges

Syed Raheel Farook, his wife, and the wife of the only person charged in the terrorist attack in San Bernardino have all been indicted in federal court.

Damian Dovarganes/AP
An US Marshall court security officer escorts Rafia Farook, the mother of Syed Raheel Farook, out of federal court in Riverside, Calif., Thursday. Three people including Syed Raheel Farook with close family ties to the couple responsible for the San Bernardino terror attack were arrested Thursday.

The brother of the San Bernardino shooter and two Russian sisters have been charged with marriage fraud in a case that surfaced through investigations following the December 2 shooting.

Syed Raheel Farook, brother of shooter Syed Rizwan Farook, was charged in federal court with fraudulently marrying Russian woman Tatiana Chernykh in order to allow her to stay in the United States after her visa expired.

The marriage scheme came to light in the wake of the shootings, when officials questioned the only person charged in connection to the shootings, Enrique Marquez, Jr. (Both shooters were killed by law enforcement following the massacre.) Mr. Marquez admitted that his own marriage to Ms. Chernykh’s sister, Mariya, was fraudulent.

Marquez told officials that he received $200 per month in order to remain married to Chernykh, whose visa expired in 2009.

Although all three people charged in this case have connections to the San Bernardino shooters, their legal representatives are quick to remind the public that this case is unrelated to the December shootings.

"This is about a misrepresentation of an act of marriage. This is not about terrorism," said Farook’s attorney, Ronald Cordova.

Farook’s mother posted bond for both her son and his wife, Tatiana, $25,000 each. Mariya’s boyfriend (not Marquez) and the father of her child posted her $50,000 bond, which was higher than Farook and her sister’s, as authorities say she is most culpable for the marriage scheme.

James Wedick, a former Federal Bureau of Investigation agent, says the government may have brought charges against the three individuals as a bargaining chip to obtain more information about the shooting.

"It suggests to me they weren't talking so the government decided to ask a grand jury to return charges," Mr. Wedick told the Associated Press. "If they were cooperating, they'd probably make some kind of deal."

Farook’s lawyer says that his client’s cooperation with the government may have led to the trouble he is in today. Cordova told the Associated Press that in cooperating with the government as openly as he did, Farook may have inadvertently shared information that led to current charges.

If convicted, Farook, his wife, and her sister will each face up to five years in prison for lying on immigration documents.

Mariya Chernykh, however, could face up to twenty five years for related charges, including misuse of visas and perjury.

All three individuals are set to stand trial on June 21 in Los Angeles.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.