Serial's Adnan Syed returns to court. What happens now?

'Serial' star Adnan Syed, serving a life sentence after his 2000 murder conviction, returns to a Maryland appeals court Wednesday to request a new trial. 

Barbara Haddock Taylor/The Baltimore Sun via AP
Adnan Syed enters Courthouse East in Baltimore prior to a hearing on Wednesday, Feb. 3, 2016 in Baltimore. The hearing, scheduled to last three days before Baltimore Circuit Judge Martin Welch, is meant to determine whether Syed's conviction will be overturned and case retried.

Podcast star and convicted murderer Adnan Syed will return to a Maryland appeals court Wednesday to argue for a new trial. 

In 1999, when he was 17, Mr. Syed was accused of strangling former girlfriend Hae Min Lee and leaving her body in a Baltimore park. He was convicted and sentenced to life in prison in 2000. [Editor's note: The original story misstated Syed's age.]

Syed’s case had been closed for years when Rabia Chaudry, a Syed family friend, brought the case to producer Sarah Koenig, a former Baltimore Sun reporter. Through a multiple series podcast, Ms. Koenig conducted interviews with suspects and witnesses associated with the case, ultimately questioning the fairness of Syed’s trial. With millions of listeners tuning in each week, Syed gained a loyal following of fans insisting on his innocence.

“Not many ineffective-assistance claims get this worked up, this fully fleshed out,” said Maryland appellate attorney Steven Klepper, who believes there is a “significant” chance of a new trial, to The Baltimore Sun. “Adnan has excellent counsel and a lot of great facts on his side.” 

The “great facts” surround two issues that were not addressed in his trial: alibi witness and former classmate Asia McClain, who claims she was with Syed at the time of the murder, and cell phone data that defense attorneys argue was used in a misleading way.

“We’ve waited a long time to get back into court and to put on witnesses that will prove our claim, and that’s exactly what we’re going to do this week,” Syed’s new attorney C. Justin Brown told the Associated Press. 

Prosecutors called no eyewitnesses or and used no DNA evidence during Syed’s trial, and largely relied on cell tower data that they claimed linked Syed to the park area where Ms. Lee’s body was found. But Mr. Brown says the state intentionally excluded a cover sheet from the AT&T data that warns of the inherent unreliability of cell towers' locating services. 

In addition, Ms. McClain is expected to testify Wednesday, which she did not do in the first trial. McClain filed an affidavit last year saying she could corroborate Syed’s alibi, and the defense will likely present letters McClain sent to Syed in prison in 1999 where McClain wrote, “I’m not sure if you remember talking to me in the library on 13 January but I remember chatting with you.” 

Syed told his lawyer at the time, Christina Gutierrez, to contact McClain but she never did. Ms. Gutierrez was later disbarred in connection with other cases. 

While McClain told The Sun last year she has “no doubt” that she saw Syed in the library on that January afternoon, she is not willing to claim his innocence outright. 

“I know that across offices and homes in America, and beyond, people have been discussing Adnan’s guilt or innocence,” she tells The Sun. “I can only tell you what it is I know. Whether this information means that Adnan is innocent, or deserves a new trial, is a decision for others to make.” 

Syed’s second chance at innocence is one of many true crime follow-ups in recent months that are straddling the line between entertainment and justice.  

After Netflix aired the documentary series “Making of a Murderer” last month, over 180,000 people signed an online petition for President Obama to pardon the accused killer Steven Avery. And HBO’s documentary “The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst,” aired last year and is credited with finally charging suspect Robert Durst with murder

And true crime fame definitely contributed to Syed’s second chance at justice Wednesday. 

“We are confident that when the court hears all of the evidence it will do the right thing: Grant Adnan Syed a new trial,” Brown said Tuesday.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.