Why Congress tightened the law on foreign diplomats hiring staff

A 'delicate balancing act' for the State Department in overseeing the treatment of staff at foreign missions in the US. 

Rajanish Kakade/AP
Devyani Khobragade, center, in Mumbai, India, on March 12, 2014, Ms. Khobragade, then deputy consul general for India in New York, was arrested in 2013 on charges of fraudulently obtaining a work visa for her housekeeper and lying about the employee’s pay.

The US State Department oversees the issuance of visas to household workers accompanying diplomats and employees of international organizations. In recent years, it has taken steps to protect these workers from abuse, though anti-trafficking advocates say there’s still more it can do.

In a 2008 revision to the law protecting trafficking victims, Congress bolstered the contract requirements that foreign employers must follow when hiring domestic workers. And if workers complain about not getting paid properly, the State Department will request proof of payment with reference to the contract.

One long-awaited step took place in October 2015: The State Department launched a yearly in-person registration of these domestic workers, to better ensure they understand their rights. It currently covers only diplomatic employees in the Washington, D.C., area, but will eventually expand, says a department spokesperson.

US law also directs the secretary of State to suspend countries and international organizations from the visa programs for domestic workers if there is credible evidence of exploitation by an employee. The secretary can decline to suspend if steps are in place to ensure such abuses don’t reoccur.

To date, no foreign mission has been sanctioned. Activists say the US is reluctant to rebuke major countries whose diplomats are cited.

In the case of Devyani Khobragade, an Indian envoy posted to New York, there was a diplomatic spat after her arrest in 2013 on charges of visa fraud and false statements regarding pay and conditions for her nanny/housekeeper. Amid uproar in India, Ms. Khobragade was able to leave the US, but the charges await her if she returns.

India retaliated for her arrest by removing concrete barriers in front of the US embassy in New Delhi and expelling a US diplomat who had assisted the nanny’s family in obtaining US visas. 

“There’s a delicate balancing act … for the State Department, which I understand. But it also has a vested interest in promoting the values of protecting human rights,” says Ivy Suriyopas, a lawyer who has represented domestic workers in civil lawsuits.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Congress tightened the law on foreign diplomats hiring staff
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today