Tamar Rice video: What new analysis says about his shooting

Tamar Rice's hands were in his pockets and he wasn't warned before he was shot, says a new analysis of the video.

Jose Luis Magana/AP/File
In a Monday, Dec. 1, 2014 file photo, Tomiko Shine holds up a picture of Tamir Rice, the 12 year old boy fatally shot on Nov. 22 by a rookie police officer, in Cleveland, Ohio, during a protest in response to a grand jury's decision in Ferguson, Mo. to not indict police officer Darren Wilson in the shooting death of Michael Brown, in Washington.

An analysis of security camera video of the fatal shooting of a 12-year-old boy show his hands in his jacket pockets and never reached for the airsoft pellet gun that was tucked in his waistband when a Cleveland police officer fatally shot him, an expert in biomechanics and kinetics says.

According to a report released late Friday by an expert hired by the boy's family to review a frame-by-frame video of the shooting, Tamir Rice did not have enough time to remove his hands from his pockets before being fatally shot and his hands were not visible to the officer.

Dr. Jesse L. Wobrock, an accident reconstructionist and biomechanics expert concluded that, "The scientific analysis and timing involved do not support any claim that there was a meaningful exchange between officer Loehmann and Tamir Rice, before [Tamir] was shot," according to Cleveland.com.

Tamir was shot after authorities responded to a call about a man waving around a gun outside a recreation center in November 2014.

Timothy Loehmann, The rookie officer who fired the fatal shots, told investigators he repeatedly ordered the boy to "show me your hands" then saw Tamir pulling a weapon from his waistband before he opened fire, according to the Associated Press.

It turned out to be Tamir holding a realistic-looking toy gun.

Previous reports concluded that Loehmann shot Tamir within 1.7 seconds of opening the car door. But according to the review by California-based shooting reconstruction expert Jesse Wobrock, the officers shot him within less than one second after he exited the police car.

Wobrock report states that Tamir could not have heard commands to show his hands, since the patrol car windows were rolled up.

"Based on the timing of this event, Tamir Rice did not have enough time to perceive and react to any verbal commands, which is exemplified by the fact that his right hand was still in his jacket pocket at the time he was shot," Wobrock said.

This new analysis of the video contradicts what experts hired by the prosecutor’s office have found.

In October, retired Virginia FBI agent Kimberly Crawford and Denver-area District Attorney S. Lamar Sims, nationally renowned experts on police use-of-force issues released a report stating that the shooting was justified

"There can be no doubt that Rice's death was tragic and, indeed, when one considers his age, heartbreaking," Sims wrote in a 52-page analysis. "However, I conclude that Officer Loehmann's belief that Rice posed a threat of serious physical harm or death was objectively reasonable as was his response to that perceived threat."

The release of Wobrock report comes as a grand jury is currently hearing evidence on whether Loehmann should be charged criminally.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tamar Rice video: What new analysis says about his shooting
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today