Chicago Police Department: A pattern of covering up officer shootings?

As details about Laquan McDonald's fatal shooting emerge, another case from 2005 is brought to light that suggests a pattern of cover up by Chicago police. 

Chicago Police Department/AP/File
In this Oct. 20, 2014 frame from dash-cam video provided by the Chicago Police Department, Laquan McDonald, right, walks down the street moments before being shot by officer Jason Van Dyke in Chicago. Van Dyke, who shot McDonald 16 times, was charged with first-degree murder Tuesday, Nov. 24, 2015. The video has no sound, nor do videos from four other squad cars at the scene. But police protocol indicates that all the cruisers should have been recording audio that night.

Did the Chicago Police Department try to cover up the 2014 shooting of black teenager Laquan McDonald?

Police reports released Friday sharply contrast with the dashcam videos released a few days prior. In the video, it appears Mr. McDonald was moving away from a group of police when he was shot 16 times by officer Jason Van Dyke, most of which were fired “after the teen had crumpled to the ground and was barely moving,” reported the Associated Press.

But in the written police reports filed by Mr. Van Dyke and the other officers who were present that night in Oct. 2014, they claimed McDonald was armed, “swinging a knife in an aggressive, exaggerated manner,” and that even once shot, McDonald “kept trying to get up with the knife in his hand.”

After fighting for months in court to keep the video surveillance private and taking more than a year to charge Van Dyke with first-degree murder, the Chicago police department is now under federal investigation and some city officials have been accused of contributing to a cover up. In addition, Chicago authorities have not yet given a convincing explanation as to why the videos released this past week did not have audio, even though audio should have been recorded in conjunction with the videos.

Police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi suggested that the absence of audio was a technological fault. In an e-mail to The Associated Press, he wrote: "As with any technology, at times software issues or operator error may keep the cameras from operating as they normally should."

To confuse matters more, a version of the shooting was released on YouTube with fake audio

Another case with striking similarities suggests a pattern of deception in the Chicago Police Department. The focus on Van Dyke's actions in 2014 has raised questions about how Chicago police handled a 2005 shooting. A lawsuit claims that the Chicago police shot Emmanuel Lopez 16 times “without justification” and then filed reports claiming Mr. Lopez had tried to “run over an officer with his car.”

Van Dyke was one of the first officers on the scene, and was later tasked with writing the general offense case report. However, Van Dyke admitted under oath in 2008 that instead of conducting his own interviews, he copied verbatim a typed narrative handed to him by detectives. Van Dyke further “acknowledged that he did not know where the detectives had gotten their version of events,” reported the Chicago Tribune.

All of the officers involved in the shooting were officially cleared, despite an admission by Pedro Solis’, the officer who shot Mr. Lopez 11 of 16 times, that he had been drinking prior to pursuing Lopez, a detail that was left out of official reports.

Van Dyke's actions "show the effort the Chicago Police Department will go to in order to cover up police misconduct," said the Lopez family's lawyer, Terry Ekl, who has successfully sued the department multiple times in recent years. "They were trying to keep a lid on how this shooting took place and to concoct a defense for shooting an unarmed guy 16 times," reported The Chicago Tribune.

In both McDonald’s case and the Lopez case, questions have been raised about the validity of the police reports. Politicians (including Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders) and activists have called for further investigation into the Chicago Police Department.

"I join with those calling for a federal investigation into the practices of the Chicago Police Department," Mr. Sanders said in a statement released Friday. "Furthermore, any official who helped suppress the videotape of Laquan McDonald's murder should be held accountable. And any elected official with knowledge that the tape was being suppressed or improperly withheld should resign. No one should be shielded by power or position."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Chicago Police Department: A pattern of covering up officer shootings?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today